Adolf Hitler is generally accepted as the most evil man in history and he must remain so. There is no way out for Hitler, we have all seen the Hollywood films, those poor Jews, getting out of the cattle wagons and being marched towards the place where we see their hair falling to the floor, then the room where their cloths fall to the floor and then the room where we hear the duh duuuuuhn music and a close up of that deadly shower head.
We have never seen a film which exposes anything other than that, at least I have never seen a film which deviates from this stock version of history. To question this version is to expose oneself to a torrent of abuse and for many a term of imprisonment.
Inexplicably, there is no evidence whatsoever in support of these claims and yet there is a mountain of evidence suggesting that they are lies. Nevertheless, with what appears to be proof positive of the disinformation, with which we have been spoon-fed since the cradle, before their eyes, most people, instead of taking the trouble to check it out, search for a way of getting around this evidence.
I have never been asked the question as to why, Hitler is so hated, everybody knows exactly why he is so bad. We have all been fed the same story. At the same time we have been quietly deceived about the actual part played in the story of Hitler by the Jews, a group which we all love because of the manner in which they were treated by Hitler and the Germans.
I happened to mention to a colleague a while ago that perhaps Hitler was not as bad as he was painted. His response was to ask me if I was a Fascist. I asked him what he meant by that. What was wrong with Fascism? His response was to insist that all the Dictators were Fascists. I asked him if they were Fascist despite their politics or because of their politics. He had no idea what I meant. When I explained that Fascism was a political system which like all systems could be used for the good or for the bad and that Hitler had used them for the good he sneered at me.
He warned me that if I dared to suggest that after what the Fascist Hitler had done to the Jews, that his political system could be used for the good, I would find that he would not be speaking to me again. That is the measure of ignorance even amongst the relatively intelligent sector of society.
When asked about the treatment of the Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank, most folk respond with the assertion that Israel has the right to defend itself against terrorist attacks. Hamas is considered to be a terrorist organisation, so in response to a bottle rocket, which may make a discernible hole in the sand, Israel has the right to kill two thousand civilians.
In France during the war, a war which along with the UK, France had declared against Germany and from which they rapidly exited by capitulating without firing a shot, which was of course all part of the Master Plan, there arose a group called The Free French or indeed The French Resistance. They were few in number during the war, however after hostilities ended they were numerous.
The aim of this group was to resist the occupying German forces, an objective which we can all applaud, despite the fact that in reality, it was to make sure that Hitler and Germany were not defeated before the rest of the Master Plan was accomplished. I am sure that you realise that the Master Plan was to force Hitler to take on Russia single handed, in order kill as many Germans as possible, to raze every German city and large town to the ground and to facilitate the entry of Stalin and the Russian Sector into Europe. all of which would lead on to the installation of the New Soviet Union in Europe, all of which has been accomplished.
In Palestine the Jews are an occupying force. In order to prevent any serious insurrection the Jews have incarcerated over one million souls into a vast Concentration Camp, in which they attack and destroy and murder and maim the prisoners and their hovels on a whim. Do you get my drift?
There are many people who suggest that Hitler was in fact a Jew. A Rothschild bastard in fact, which is how and why he became the Führer in the first place. I once checked online to see if there was in fact any evidence of this. I stumbled upon a site which suggested that after genetic examination it was found that Hitler was of African and Jewish origin. Surprisingly when I checked the site from which this information arrived, I was amazed to find that it was the Holocaust Museum site.
I have been pondering ever since as to how they had managed to find a trace of Jew in a specimen of DNA. However this claim would suggest that they had either not realized that should this be so, it would indicate that the Jews themselves had carried out the Shoah, financed by Rothschild, or that they fully understood that there was no such thing.
Now there are numerous events which have taken place over the centuries, long, long, before the birth of Adolf Hitler and many more long after his death, for example the unnoticed English Revolution, the British people were not even aware of it passing.
Oliver Cromwell the sadistic animal who slaughtered the Irish, in order to finance the English Civil War was obliged to accept poisoned loans from the Jewish Dutch Bankers. When he found himself unable to repay the debt and in need of further financing he agreed to allow the Jews back into England from where they had been banished. Part of the deal was the murder of Charles the first. Cromwell accepted all of these provisions and the Jews flooded into England. Within less than twenty years London was ablaze and twenty-five years after that the Jews controlled the money supply and the English Deficit had been manufactured.
A similar state of affairs was set up in France, when after the revolutionary slaughter of the intelligentsia and the Bourgeoisie including the King and his Queen, a system of finance based on a gold standard was imposed, which introduced the French to the same Deficit/Debt ridden monetary system. The heads rolled and the blood ran down the streets of Paris in order to achieve this aim.
A few decades later the City of London was already experimenting with a European Genocide in Ireland where five million souls were either starved to death or shot while attempting to grab some of the millions of tons of produce, guarded by English Troops, on its way to the Irish harbours en route to England.
In 1917, skulking behind the slaughter of the Great War, the Jews unleashed their slaughterers on Russia, under the leadership of a pack of Jews from the US and in the words of Churchill:
“This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus-Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States)… this worldwide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilisation and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the 19 th century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire.” Churchill wrote this in the Illustrated Sunday Herald in February 1920
This was written long before Hitler could be accused of any dream of World Domination or indeed domination of Europe. The first act of these barbarians in Russia was the cull of the Russian Orthodox Christians, after that the intelligentsia and Industrialists oh! and of course the Royal Family.
The same Jew, Churchill was himself responsible for the starvation of millions of Bengali during WW2, for no better reason than that he may have need of their foodstuffs to feed the British Army. In the end he had no need of it.
Churchill’s description of this Jewish Movement, was quickly followed by the Jewish Young Turks, genocide in Armenia a genocide which was so successful that the Armenian’s were completely eliminated from Turkey.
So all in all, during the time frame of a few decades, whatever claims the Jews may have had of persecution pales into total insignificance when compared with the slaughters for which they have been responsible, this is before we even speculate as to how many souls were eliminated in China by the Jewish puppet Mao Zedong.
So what justification can they possibly have for the stance they are maintaining over WW2 and Hitler? Well there is one glaring difference between all of those other genocides and the “holocaust,” the evidence is on the ground, for all of the others, whereas there is not a shred of evidence in support of the “holocaust.” So one can only speculate as to what would be the response of the general public should there prove to be real evidence proving that it was a lie. This is one of the clips direct from the holocaust museum video library, which we were never shown.
So there you have it, when all of the accusations against Hitler fail to hit the mark, the last and most deadly smear to his integrity is to call him a Jew. In a strange way he has been a godsend for the Jews, who as a result of their claims of his behaviour have garnered billions of Dollars and Deutsch-marks in reparations for an act which to this day is hotly disputed.
The unending saga of Oscar Pistorius, is winding down. The sort of sentence which his lawyer and a psychologist are proposing for Oscar; whom has been found guilty of Culpable Homicide, which is the least he could have expected for loosing off four dum-dum bullets through a toilet door, knowing full well that there was someone on the other side, unlike to rapist in my previous post who was sentenced to five years in prison, Oscar’s team are suggesting house arrest, in his uncles mansion.
I have followed this case from the word go and having heard the defence case, my response would have been a verdict of murder, because as far as I was concerned, nothing else fitted the available evidence and the inconsistencies in Oscar’s explanation.
His histrionics in Court suggested that he knew full well that his main aim should be to convince the Judge that he was a broken man, as I would, should I find myself facing a life sentence in an African gaol.
Apart from that the tale he told, which was in fact the only tale available, was so ridiculous that it beggars belief that the Judge was not convinced of his guilt of murder, any Jury hearing the same story would no doubt have arrived at a majority verdict at least, of murder.
Oscar explained to the Court, how he had been in bed with Reeva, he decided to close the balcony window, which involved moving a fan which had been helping to cool the bedroom. He offered no reason as to why. This he did in the dark.
Reeva was in bed, no more than a couple of feet away from Oscar, who carried his business with the fan, with his back towards the bed, so he failed to notice that Reeva had silently got out of bed, found her telephone in the dark, which she apparently used as a torch.
Oscar, heard no movement, saw no sign of a torch as Reeva left the bedroom, without turning on a light, walked along a corridor, still in the dark, entered the bathroom and into a small toilet and locked the door, all without turning on a light.
Oscar, still in the bedroom, having failed to notice that Reeva was no longer in the room, thought he heard a noise. He told the absent Reeva to call the Police. He failed to notice that she did not reply.
Still in the dark he went down the corridor on his stumps and thought he heard a noise coming from the bathroom, similar to the sound of a window sliding open.
He went back to his bedroom, still in the dark and found his gun, In normal circumstances one might have expected him, at this point to call the Security Guard or to at least ask Reeva if she had called the Police but no, he did not and still in the dark he did not notice that she was not there.
Still on his stumps he went back down the corridor shouting, “Get out of my f*****g house,” at whoever he thought might be in the bathroom, Reeva did not cry out anything in the order of, “Who are you shouting at Oscar? Is there someone in the house?” or some such thing. The prosecutor suggested that he was shouting at Reeva to get out of the house, after their argument, which had been overheard by several witnesses.
No, not a bit of it, Reeva simply stood silently behind the door, while Oscar, still in he dark; which is of course of vital importance in the entire tale, thought he heard something else and he accidentally fired four dum-dum bullets through the toilet door. There was apparently no recoil from his gun, which may have caused at least one of the shots to go off target. Nope they all hit the target.
Oscar then desecrated the whole crime scene, with the lights now turned on and removed the corpse from the scene, which is never recommended, as to move an injured person is not the most intelligent thing to do, having smashed the door open with a cricket bat.
Is it any wonder that the Police found it difficult to believe his Fairy Tale?
For days now we have been saturated with calls for a young footballer to be banned from continuing his career because he is apparently a convicted rapist. It would appear that to serve your sentence is no longer enough to satisfy the female need of vengeance or in some cases a cash pay-out.
He must apparently, be prepared to spend the rest of his life as a leper, apart from normal society, living in a state of limbo, for what? Simply because he was stupid enough to have sex with a woman, who had apparently been drinking along with him? With whom he then went to a hotel, where he, in his inebriated state, had sex with her, in her inebriate state.
She then went to the police claiming that she had been raped, because she had not agreed to the sexual act. Well I can tell you for nothing, had I been that footballer, my immediate response would have been, that I had not given my permission for her to have sex with me. What is more, I would have insisted that my life has been ruined, I feel defiled and all the rest of it. On top of that I would never have agreed to it had I not been drunk. End of story. The whole business did not involve any form of violence.
The Conservative Party, which is on its way to reneging on the promises which were made to the Scottish people, during the referendum. Promises which were made merely to conjure up a suitable excuse as to why the electorate had decided to vote no, when in fact the referendum result was rigged. They have now apparently decided that “Private/Public” agreements are only suitable when they are in favour of the “Private” side of the deal.
Today it was announced that they are now selling off the peoples holding in Euro Star, no doubt, as with the Post Office, at a knockdown price. Why should this lucrative business, which the people are earning more than forty million and rising pounds per year be up for sale? We know where the money earned will end up, that is in the coffers of the Central Bankers,in part payment of the fraudulent debt, which the Central Bank is holding.
When Euro Star was in private hands, it collapsed under a mountain of debt. Public money was used to bail it out. It is now earning a fortune, which is of course why it is up for sale. Does this mean that the only function of the Public side of these deals is to pay construction costs and then allow others to keep the profits?
Has Cameron now taken for himself the power to sell England by the pound, without any reference to the people who funded these deals in the first place? Another prime example is the Royal Bank of Scotland, why does the government not retain control of this business which was totally destroyed by its “private” ownership and like Euro Star had to be bailed out?
The Jew Osborne, is forever calling for “Private” investment in projects, which is presented as being to the benefit of the people. This is just another lie. There is no such thing as private investment, however much money the “private” side of a deal invest, they always earn more back from the people. This means in effect that the best deal for the people is to keep control of these enterprises.
It has already been suggested that after the government has signed yet another of those irreversible treaties, TTIP, with the US, the first deal on the table will be The National Health Service. Well if these folk are so interested in controlling a health care system, which is going to be better for the patient, why not set it up now? If more money is needed to run the NHS than the UK can afford to pay, where is the extra money coming from? Out of the pockets of altruistic investors? I think not, you will be making up the difference, they want only the profits.
These folk have already taken control of every aspect of the lives of the British people. Goldman Sachs controls the Bank of England, which means the Economy. Water has gone private, Electricity and Gas the same thing. The Transport Network, which was the first thing to be Nationalised, after the War, has already been “privatised”, only the lucrative part of course, the people still maintain the Permanent Way for trains and the motorways for lorries.
British Telecom soon went under the hammer, handing over the billions of pounds, which are now being made through new technologies, into the hands of a few investors, who immediately send it overseas.
Gordon Brown, not content with selling off the UK Gold Reserves, managed to sell off what was left of the once proud British Steel and paid an Indian to set the same factory up in India, just before leaving office. Yes that’s right to cut down carbon emissions?
Mad Maggie Thatcher, with the willing assistance of the Good Old British Bobby, completely destroyed the British Coal Industry, to suit her husbands friends in the Oil Industry, she then, of course, handed North Sea Oil, lock, stock and barrel to private industry, who do not sell the oil to the British people at a price which corresponds in some way with the cost of production but at the inflated price on the Commodity Markets. Oil costs roughly 2-3 dollars a barrel to produce and sells at around 100 dollars a barrel on the market.
The moment I saw the hagette from Sky News, Alex Crawford, prowling around, where all men fear to tread, in the Ebola ridden West of Africa, I knew there was something wrong.
I offer you this clip, make of it what you will but I sure as hell, smell a rat. There are already calls to make a vaccine, which has appeared from nowhere, mandatory, at gunpoint if necessary.
It is the thirtieth anniversary of the attempt to rid the world of the government of Margaret Thatcher. The Irish Republican Army, planted bombs in the Brighton Hotel, in which she and members of her staff were lodged during the Conservative Party Conference. This was cold-blooded terrorism, so we are told.
During a debate on Murnaghan, the “Flagship” Sky News Sunday morning political farce, a guest suggested that the IRA at least made efforts to limit casualties, by warning the Police of bomb attacks, with coded messages. This annoyed Murnaghan, an “Irishman,” who interjected with “Let’s not glamorise them, they were terrorists after all.”
Another guest added, “Unlike the Muslim terrorists, whose aim is to kill as many innocent people as possible, like on 911 and 7-7,” he then mentioned a few other foiled plots, all of which were based on rubbish, so apart from the two “False Flag” attacks, which have never been properly investigated, in order to protect the guilty, there is no evidence of any serious Muslim terrorism. Murnaghan made no comment.
The next segment included a Tory MP, who announced outright that he believes that the UK should have been bombing Syria into submission, from the word go. Another guest posed the question, “Why was the UK refusing to recognise the State of Palestine?” Murnaghan whined about Palestinian terrorism and the plight of those poor Israelis who might find themselves isolated on their settlements, built on stolen land, should the real borders be accepted by the International Community, whatever that is. This we are told, is NOT cold-blooded terrorism. Where’s the harm in a few buckets of blood running down a foreign street?
Perhaps Murnaghan should have a quiet word with his colleague, Sam Kiley, the shaven headed merchant of disinformation on Sky News, who recently informed us that David Cameron’s remark about reserving the right to put “Boots on the ground” in Syria, should circumstances demand, without a debate in Parliament, to be perfectly justified, should there be a brutal genocidal attack against civilians, for example. Murnaghan could ask Kiley why the continuing genocide by Israel against the civilians in Gaza and the West Bank, did not qualify for the same sort of intervention, why were Khazar Jews not considered as terrorists? Note that any mention of Assad includes the word “brutal.”
The problem with all of these murderous escapades, in which the British have been involved, it has never been clear as the whether there is a definite political aim in view or whether they amount to no more than a policy of International Genocide.
It has been made perfectly clear that there was a mountain of lies generated by the US and UK, along with their “cuddly coalition” to destroy Iraq. Part of this destruction involved the cooperation of the newly installed Islamic government in Iran, the very same Iran which was involved in the “Iran/Contra Affair,” with that US “Mob” The Central Intelligence Agency.
This cooperation with Iran, clearly shows the US arming of both sides in the war between Iran and Iraq, with the support of Israel, which like the US, now considers Iran as their mortal enemy and yet it was the Secular state of Iraq, with its mixed race population, which lived peacefully together, which was destroyed, without a moments care for the fate of the millions of innocent deaths which ensued.
The one sure thing about this war with Iran, is the fact that it depleted Saddam Hussein’s Military capabilities. It was adequate to enter Kuwait, with the OK of the US, to sort out a problem of “slant drilling” and pumping of Iraqi oil but of course the rest of the Iraqi military machine was annihilated, with illegal weapons, during the retreat home. We then, on top of had all that, the Sanctions, which led to the deaths of at least one million innocent souls, including five hundred thousand children.
So when “Our Boys” went in with “Shock and Awe” they were attacking a basically defenceless country and did they go to town? It was nothing more than a “Demolition Derby.” What the Coalition achieved in Iraq was a “Crime Against Humanity,” based on lies and a desire to control all of the oil and gas in the Middle East. It was of course presented as “humanitarian.”
The same lies applied to the invasion and destruction of Afghanistan and Libya. Having created exactly what they had aimed for in Libya, chaos, the British are still complimenting themselves on their courageous act of altruism and swear that the Libyan people are now, despite their current, difficulties, far better off than under Gadaffi.
In Syria, where the British had long been planning to replace the Assad family with their chosen puppets, the initial murders were carried out by aid terrorists, under the control of the SAS, with Stuart Ramsey and Sky News on hand to film The Revolution.
The British would do well to remember that the following video clip, show exactly what the Jewish leaders of the main political Parties in the UK are doing with your taxes. The Jew Cameron has just announced a three-year war, using these same murdering filth, to unseat a man, Assad, who is guilty of no crime, apart from the lies which are told against him by the Jewish controlled governments, who are lined up against him and who have already seen to the complete destruction of the country and the displacement of millions of people.
All of the current exploits of the US and UK could have come straight out of the notebook of Lewis Carroll. The British are training PKK terrorists to fight against ISIL; which was set up by the CIA, who we are being told are fighting rebels which have already been armed and trained by the British to fight Assad in Syria, a continuing war of which we hear very little these days, while the British are bombing sand dunes in the desert, pretending to destroy ISIL, who they are of course, continuing to support, while Turkey, which considers the PKK to be terrorists, is lining up dozens of tanks on the Syrian border but refusing to help the Peshmerger’s, while the US, like the British are dropping a few innocuous bombs, which do nothing to help the fighters on the ground, while in reality, this whole bunch of scum, are scratching around desperately seeking an excuse to destroy Syria.
I was interested in the initial excuse for the attack on this brutal dictator Assad. What I found was that all of his so-called Crimes Against Humanity, were allegedly committed during this ongoing struggle with the International Murdering Scum, now called ISIL. I can find no provable account of any atrocities against his own people prior to this struggle. There has been no mention of the fact that Syria was a prosperous country, with a contented population, nor of the fact that before the British initiated onslaught, he had already handed over more power to the elected Parliament. He was in fact an example of Plato’s idea of the “best we can hope for” a considerate dictator.
Much can be said of that other unfortunate, Gadaffi in Libya. The United Nations listed Libya above the UK in literacy, it was the country with the highest standard of living in Africa. They had free education, at hoe and abroad, a free health service, with the most modern facilities and there were no homeless people in Libya.
When the “Arab Spring” kicked off, particularly in Egypt, from the tone of the reporting on the BBC and Sky News, it soon became clear that there was more to this than was being explained on the “News.” The Muslim Brotherhood was in talks with Al Baradei in London, while the Generals were in Virginia, holding talks with the CIA.
When the street attacks started in Benghazi, it soon became clear that the British had been involved in “uprising” in Libya from the word go. Men were arrested in the desert, who were said to be UK “Diplomats” and there was evidence of SAS on the ground.
This takes our tale all the way back to the Iran/Contra Affair. Press TV, “The Voice of the Voiceless” immediately started the character assassination of Gadaffi and his regime, while Little Willy Hague, was telling us he had humanitarianism in his genes. To me it was clear that the real target of the Arab Spring was Libya. In my posts I begged Press TV not to denigrate Gadaffi, because to justify an attack on Libya would open the floodgates and it would soon be the turn of others.
Sadly, my fears were well founded, Libya is gone and it will never come back. Press TV and its team of British reporters, Nick Jones and Johnny Miller, were somewhat more extreme in their reporting than either Sky News or indeed the BBC, which begs the question, What is the real role of Iran in the mayhem in the Middle East?
We are well aware that the Mullahs were cosseted in Paris, waiting for the CIA to carry out the coup d’etat in Tehran. displacing the Shah, who was himself put in power after the overthrow of the Mosedeque regime. They also provided the excuse to hike up the price of fuel in Europe, to the delight of the Oil Barons and they now appear to be well placed to benefit from the sanctions which have been placed on Russia, by providing an alternative to Russian Gas and Oil.
All of the other enemies of Israel, Assad, Hussein, Gadaffi, Hezbollah, Hamas, have already been taken care of, why not Iran. Why wait until they have a bomb, if that is their aim?
The same sort of allegations have been made against Adolf Hitler, another victim of British duplicity, like Gadaffi, he pulled his people out of poverty, transforming them into the most prosperous country in Europe, while the rest of the Continent was still wallowing in poverty and unemployment as a result of the sort of banking fraud, from which we are once more suffering.
Hitler and Germany were the excuse to unleash a World War, which generated so much debt, that the bankers were kept in comfort in their palaces, sipping Champagne and chomping Caviare, for the following sixty years, drowning in usury and other financial frauds.
As with Assad, the claims against Hitler, were to do with things which allegedly took place after the start of the war, there is not a shred of evidence that he was guilty of any crime prior to that. Nevertheless most people believe that the war was declared to save those poor mistreated Jews.
Right now, the British public is being deluged with spokesmen who are insisting that the UK should start an offensive in Syria, to save the Kurds, while Turkey which is at war with these same Kurds sits on the border watching them die. Why should the British be more responsible for the fate of these people than is Turkey? Could it be that Turkey is waiting for an excuse to go straight for the throat of Assad, which they have been planning for years and are the British involved in this underhanded deal?
One thing is certain in this continuing state of war, there will be no shortage of refugees swarming into Europe, all of whom will be in need of a job. Traditionally these folk are offered the jobs which people of European origin do not want to do. Well there are not too many jobs like that these days and there is of course the other problem, the mass slaughter of Christians in the Middle East.
Saudi Arabia has long been involved in the creation of religious intolerance. The Wahhabi version of Islam originated in the Gulf States and has been despatched across the region provoking problems between Sunni and Shiite, which has now spread its wings to include Christians. That was of course always part of the plan, which is why so any Muslims have been invited into Europe, by those government which are in fact under the control of Khazar Jews and they are numerous.
The UK is already suffering from the empty promises of politicians, intent on retaining their soft job in Parliament. All of the promises made during the recent referendum in Scotland, promises which helped them win the vote, have already been forgotten by Cameron and his liars.
The British voter should not vote for one single politician who has been elected in past elections. There is no such job as “Politician” and there is no need of Political Parties. This is a form of control. Anybody who was not on board for the recent vote on re-entering the war in Iraq, immediately lost their job, that is the truth of British Democracy and the Party system.
Vote only for those with a single issue manifesto, you will soon find that they are quite capable of cooperating on those measures which are in the interest of the country? They can operate on a system of short term officials in Parliament. The system is not set in stone it can be changed for the better. Surely you can do without all of that “traditional” jeering and sneering in Parliament.
This little snippet turned up on one of my memory chips. Not too sure what he’s talking about but it sounds just a little bit too acrobatic for me.
Formerly published by the Heretical Press in Two Forbidden Voices and now out of print
The Fable of the Ducks and the Hens
|Many, many years ago
When animals could speak,
A wondrous thing the ducks befell;
Their tale is quite unique.
Down by a pond dwelt all these ducks
One day down near the entrance gate
“Oh let us in” these poor birds cried
Their feathers burned, their combs adroop
“Come in! Come in!” the ducks all quacked,