A Call From The Garrigue. Standing Up For The Under Threat White Race.

Home Of Heroes Land Of The Brave Or Simply Killers Of Kids?

There seems to be an attempt on the one hand to venerate Ed Snowden, as a “Whistle Blower” of distinction, while at the same time undermining his contribution, as nothing more than an enormous excuse to relieve the American people of a few million more Dollars.

It would appear, according to Lawyers, whom could well  be a part of the scheme themselves, that to hack into the correspondence of US Citizens, is illegal and un-Constitutional,  therefore the information which was stolen by Snowden, does not belong to the Government, it belongs to the People.

It follows from this that it would be difficult to present a case against Snowden in Court.  This has exposed the real reason for the slow-motion release of Snowden’s information, he is in the process of “selling” his cache of documents in a combine with a well-known, on-line second-hand  shop and a safe provider of internet payments. The sum mentioned, to purchase the documents, is in the order of 250 million Dollars.

The US Government will of course make the payment, channelled through the NSA, to avoid further “damaging” releases of documents. Should this be so, that a Government is in the process of paying a ransom, for no better reason than to line the pockets of a group, which has already invested into the Election funds of both Parties in the US, they must surely be eligible for Impeachment.

While we await further developments in the lucrative field of disclosures, which never actually tell us anything which we did not already know, I will leave this digression for another day, as this is Sunday, which is celebrated by the BBC, with a transmission, which is in the hands of one of its Merchants of Deceit, well-known to those whom have the courage to listen to the ‘Today,’ News programme on Radio Four, for Sundays’ he is a Religious man.

I took a quick listen, because I happened upon an EPG which announced a mention of Dieudonné, a subject in which I am interested. It all went to plan, well it would, would it not? Dieudonné was apparently an anti-Semite, he callously joked about the holocaust. He would himself be shocked, should a Jewish comic make derogatory remarks about slavery. Dieudonné would suggest that Jews are responsible for all the ills of the World. Ya-de-ya-de-yah.

This is the sort of obfuscation, for which the BBC has been responsible, since its early days, under Lord Reith. In the simple statement above, it is taken for granted, with no possibility of dispute, that Dieudonné would be shocked, should a remark be made about slavery,  by a Jew.

Well so would I, should I be given the opportunity to reply and to suggest that Jews, were the Slave Traders in Chief, they ran a virtual monopoly of slavery. This is of course absent from Spielberg films such as Amistad or indeed Lincoln, whom it is still suggested, Abolished Slavery. Which is totally untrue. There are, at this moment, in the US, probably more Black slaves, working in Private Prisons, than once worked the cotton fields? Slavery was never abolished in the US, for prisoners.

I would also make use of the chance to ask for a straightforward explanation, of the part played by the BBC, in the events of 911, which was itself responsible for such a wave of anti-Muslim emotions, which has been stoked up by the Jewish media, and which resulted in such a huge death-toll of innocent Muslim people as to dwarf anything that may perhaps have happened to Jews during WW2. It is also a more serious problem than anti-Jew sentiments. Though that is changing.

The BBC reported the collapse of Building 7, twenty minutes or so in advance of the event. They should have been OBLIGED, to conduct an in-depth investigation into this event, instead they have simply ignored it. They did exactly the same thing with the leaked Emails from the Climate Research Unit. The BBC has continued the atrocious lie, which blamed a group of Muslims for an event for which there is no evidence. Is this their job?

I would also relish the opportunity to ask for the BBC definition of anti-Semitism, which should it exist, is in fact another form of anti-Muslim and does not apply in the case of Khazar Jews, whom are the Jews whom claimed to have been targeted in WW2 but uniquely to the small number of “Real Jews” whom remain, where they have always lived, in  peace, in the Middle East alongside the “real” Semitic, People of Palestine.

William Hague today claimed that there was no point in the International Criminal Court, investigating claims of British War Crimes in Iraq, where there are thousands of claims of torture, feigned executions, sodomy, beatings and a variety of other degradations of the Iraqi people.

He suggested that the response of the ICC, should be to explain that they are quite content with the British assurance, that they are carrying out a rigorous investigation of their own, which will deal with any departure from the normal, humanitarian treatment of prisoners, by British Forces, whom he assures us belong to “The Best Army in the World.”

He could well have mentioned the fabulous efforts of the Independent Police Complaints Commission, which has steadfastly refused to accept the guilt of any Police Officer, whom has been involved in the deaths of some five hundred prisoners while in Police custody and the shooting dead of any person, such as a naked man, whom they claimed had a hidden weapon, or some such garbage and a Carpenter on his way home from work, with the leg of a table in a dustbin bag in his hand.

A military man, Lord Dannatt, claimed that it was one thing to accuse the British of War Crimes but it was quite another thing to prove it. He continued that it was not in the nature of the British to engage in brutality against prisoners. Reminds me of the British claim at the end of WW2, that only the Germans could be accused of War Crimes.

In the same interview, Hague, once again inferred that in Syria, it was Assad whom was carrying out all of the atrocities, all of the murder of civilians and all of the guilt for creating the situation in the first place. He is still supporting the hired killers, whom he would have in power.

He would, in fact still prefer the exclusion of Assad from Syrian politics, while at the same time claiming that it is up to the people of Syria to choose their Government. Hague, a Friend of Israel, is in fact attempting to force Syria into the same mould as Libya, Afghanistan and Iraq. Why he should have any say in the affairs of Syria is a mystery, or is it?

The British and French between them, created all of the problems in the Middle East, at the same time as the Jews, Lords Balfour and Milner, were drawing up the Balfour Declaration, with the plan of Greater Israel already floating around in the background. The same plan very carefully placed Royal Families, where they could serve the interests of Zion and Dictators, in  those Countries, which were of future interest.

Hague continues to claim that the British Army is the best Army in the World. They would never engage in an action, deleterious to the well-being of others. Well he could tell that to the Irish and many other Peoples whom are, like the people of the Middle East suffering from the policy of Divide and Rule, which is still the policy of the Jewish/British Empire, which has carved the planet into manageable pieces and they are continuing to do so to this day.

It is often said that “They have learned nothing from past mistakes.” Well believe me, they do not make mistakes, this is all according to plan. We have all been manoeuvred into a corner and if we remain silent, like naughty children, in our corner, we are done for.

There so many things happening at the moment, that I am at a loss to keep on track. I am constantly moving from one thing to another, for which I apologise, my main intention this morning was to report the claims of War Crimes against the UK, however the moment I heard the annoying, rasping, nerve grating tones, of Wild Little Willy Hague, the slightly gay but ashamed of it, Foreign Secretary of the remnants of the once Great Country of Britain, I flew off at one tangent after another. I will attempt to compose myself in a professional manner for my next post.

PS. There is good evidence to suggest, that Ariel Sharon, the vile Butcher of Beirut, has been dead for years and like Nelson Mandela, he was stored in a freezer, to avoid an Inquest which may have discovered that he had been murdered.

The man in this photo, on a drip, is dead. His death quite obviously, stopped the ageing process. It also allowed the wearing of a shirt which buttons at the front, which is impossible to remove from an obese character like Sharon, without the assistance of a crane, in order to wash him.

8 responses

  1. Don

    Looking at it dispassionately, I see the BBC threatening to take an unknown man to court for a crime he did not commit. It doesn’t get any sillier than that. Well in fact yes it does, in that the muppet magistrates will attempt to process it given half the chance.

    Given that the license fee is being wasted to pursue this nonsense, in addition to giving generous and unwarranted payouts for senior BBC staff, the systemic misreporting of many important political events, the employing of and covering for known paedophiles, and its inexplicable prior knowledge of the destruction of WTC7, I really can’t see how I could be considered unusual in not wanting to use their services. The BBC is a totally discredited organization.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvandradio/bbc/10128702/BBC-spent-28m-of-licence-fee-payers-money-gagging-500-staff.html

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvandradio/bbc/9889289/Chaos-and-faffing-at-BBC-as-Jimmy-Savile-scandal-detonated.html

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvandradio/bbc/10423021/Rob-Wilson-MP-Time-to-scrap-unfair-poll-tax-on-television.html

    Like

    January 13, 2014 at 10:21

    • Hello Don. I don’t know whether you’ve seen it or not but there is a tale on “The Tap” someone with the same problem as you have with the Beeb.

      He lays it all out in a cogent manner. It’s worth a read.
      https://www.facebook.com/michael.aydinian

      Like

      January 13, 2014 at 22:05

  2. Les

    The British army does not commit war crimes so say the scummy politicians. I’m sure you’ve never heard of Julien Vervaecke a Belgian cyclist and winner of the Tour de France who was shot dead by Tommies after he complained about them using his house.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julien_Vervaecke
    http://codoh.com/library/document/2282

    Like

    January 13, 2014 at 08:14

    • Thanks Les. The British Army commits nothing but atrocities. It would be difficult to find any legal war in which they have been involved.

      Like

      January 13, 2014 at 15:01

  3. Don

    I was reading the other day how the Khazars are said to be able to trace their genetics back to Neanderthals which I found amusing.

    I also received a letter from our friends at the BBC telling me that I am to be taken to court for non payment of their extortion fee. I am, they instruct me, to find myself legal representation. I shan’t bother as I prefer to represent myself, and in doing so I shall raise the BBC’s foreknowledge of building 7 question, which requires answering if I am not to be considered financially aiding terrorism by paying the license fee.

    If the BBC can answer my question satisfactorily regarding building 7 then their request for public financing may stand a better chance of being considered legitimate.

    Like

    January 12, 2014 at 16:25

    • I see you are a chip off the same block as me Don. However there things which I came to understand too late when I was in the Dock. The first and most important, is that if it is in a Magistrates Court, you must always bear in mind that they are not listening to what goes on, in order to make a judgement.
      They are always on the side of authority. For example if someone is telling lies, you must not expect Magistrates to take notice, you must tell them straight out that the case should be dismissed. I failed to do this once, when someone from whom I was accused of attempting to steal something which was not there to steal, admitted that should it have been there, he would not have known whether he himself may have stolen it. I kid you not. Because I did not say outright that I was being accused by thief, they ignored his confession and gave me a suspended sentence. So think very carefully after every response by the solicitor for the Beeb.
      Have you accepted a contract. I hope you were smart enough not to do that? Are you up against a Statute or a Law? You are sure to know all the stuff like not admitting to it when they ask you “Are you Mr Silly Old Bugger from Railway Cuttings and all that rubbish you tell to simply call you Don. You can really mess them about without trying too hard Don. I once kept two Cops trapped in a Court-House from ten in the morning til four in the afternoon, they were furious. I find it hard to believe that a Licence Fee can be a Law. It must surely be a contract, if it is don’t forget to refuse the contract.
      The last time I was in Court it was for a debt for Social payments. After trying hard a panel of three Judges, sent me home. Ever since, each year I receive a bill for payments and I tell them I’m exonerated. They say nobody is exonerated. I insist they check the computer, and the computer says I am. I’m not too sure how I pulled it off, but I did. So if you confound the BBC a bit you could well be taken off their Black List.
      Please keep me in touch. By the way, down here I can pay a small charge and talk to a solicitor for half-an-hour just to get some guidance, it can be worth it. Its not only Building 7 Don its 7-7 as well. Your in a good position except they may refuse to allow the questions.

      Like

      January 12, 2014 at 18:21

      • Don

        My understanding is, as I was told by a Magistrate when in 1977 as a young man I appeared before him and impudently questioned his judgement with the words “Where’s the justice in that?”

        He peered down at me from the bench, and said “Young man.. THIS is a court of LAW – not a court of justice!”

        I learned there and then that the courts are merely administrative buildings, there’s little point arguing or appealing for fair play in them, they exist only to process us according to the law, not to serve us with justice arrived at through wisdom. In the case of the BBC the string of threatening letters they have sent are quite laughable addressed as they are to ‘the legal occupier’ – my having repeatedly refused to give my name to them. They won’t find it on the electoral roll either, as I refuse to register to vote too.

        It is my aim to entangle them from beginning to end in a process that requires that they exhaust themselves. Did you know for example, that there is no legal or lawful requirement to open a posted envelope should you be inclined not to do so? Ditto the front door. If they arrive to serve a warrant they will also find no-one here willing to divulge the slightest bit of information. Their usual opening gambit “Hello, TV licensing – are you the householder Sir?” is always met with a curt “State your full name and your business – never mind who I am” rather than the expected reply.

        I shall play this game for all I’m worth, knowing as I do that I shall win. My aim is to thoroughly embarrass them, and if possible line myself up for a claim of compensation for harrasment, as in the final analysis I genuinely don’t need a TV license as I don’t watch live broadcasts at all, but in their arrogance they refuse to believe that anyone could go through life without watching the latest bile from ‘Eastenders!’

        Like

        January 12, 2014 at 20:15

        • I always assume that they do not even know if you have received a letter unless it is Registered. I have avoided all sorts of problems because my postbox is at a locked entrance, so if I’m in doubt, I don’t collect the letter from the post, from where after two weeks it is returned to sender.

          What the Judges said to you is pretty much what I had worked out for myself, which is why I hold the system in total contempt. I live in the country-side where we still have Gendarmes, they are part of the Military and they are a decent bunch, not at all like real cops. I have not had a minutes problem with them, its the National Police and the CRS, the tough boys who dish out the shit.

          In general, apart from one time, when I was pinned to the wall in a Police station, by a cop who did not like me telling him what the law was, shouting that,In this town I’m the Law OK!

          These sort of things are all part of a varied life Don. What on earth would we have to laugh about without this crap?

          The first time I was up in Court, I didn’t even know how it all worked, so I just went into the seats with the visitors. I suddenly realised that the Judge was doing my case and he was asking if anybody knew who this chap was? I tentatively raised my hand and said I’m here your honour, full of embarrassment and he shouted at me Well what the hell are doing up there? Get down here you silly boy. Life’s full of fun Don.

          Like

          January 12, 2014 at 21:28

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.