Bankers Are Thieves!
I had a good laugh this morning, listening to the Goldman Sachs agent, the Jew Mark Carney, Governor of “The Bank,” excusing the legalised thievery, which is endemic in the banking racket.
His Sky News interrogator, Eamonn Holmes, treated his opportunity to do what the Jew Larry King, describes as, “To be a good journalist, you need only ask the right questions and demand the right answer.” King, reserved this approach, uniquely, for inconsequential interviewees, however, we might have expected a more rigorous approach from Holmes.
He might as well have left the interview to the Mrs Mopp, cleaning the office. He did not use his opportunity to ask one single, difficult question. He should be ashamed of himself. Just as he had missed his chance to explain more succinctly, what had actually taken place on “Bloody Sunday,” which was an unprovoked massacre, of unarmed Civil Rights marchers, using the lie, that the “Red Devils” had come under fire from the surrounding buildings. This action was in keeping with British atrocities, all over Ireland, in previous times.
Holmes’ most testing question was to ask whether the UK would be better off in or out of Europe, to which Carney refused to offer his opinion. The Governor is as aware as am I, that the European Union is just another Banking scam, which has enriched the one per-cent at the expense of the poor. Europe is good for nothing. These hypocrites, while claiming that Hitler had wanted to organise a Union of Europe, which would have been bad, bad, bad, are now telling us that the Bankers European Union, which has brought Europe to its knees, is good, good, good.
Holmes could have taken advantage of his opportunity to ask how those whom like Carney, are fully aware of the vast fraud, which is being inflicted on to a gullible public, can justify the huge amounts of money, which is being creamed off as Compound Interest, and deposited into the non taxable, “Foundations” of the richest people in the world, crouching behind the lie of a “deficit.”
What is never explained by Carney, and you can rest assured that no question, even approaching a truth-seeking question, will make it past the moderators, during his dialogue with “The People,” is the question of the need of a Private Central Bank, when the UK Treasury could quite easily carry out the same task, at a fraction of the cost.
Carney made no mention of the huge amount of “The Peoples” hard-earned money, which is currently being paid off “The Debt” itself, all the British hear about is the “Deficit” as if the “Debt” repayment is on hold. It is not, billions are being paid to the Central Bank, as interest on the “Debt” which in David Cameron’s words “will always be there.
That admission, slipped out of Cameron’s mouth and it was never picked up, he was never asked to explain his comment. The answer is quite simple, the “Debt” is the “Pound in the British pocket.” which carries a debt of interest, because it is a privately owned Pound, which is being used as a tax collecting device. The debt is financed by Her Majesty’s Income Tax, the “deficit” is the shortfall between Income Tax and the amount of “Tax” payable on the sum of money in circulation. Once you fully understand this fact, everything falls into place, however it appears to be difficult for people to get their head around this crime, which is what it is. Everything in the following clip applies to the Bank of England as it does to the European Central Bank.
The other piece of nonsense on todays News is the continuing saga of claims that the Russian government, must have been aware of the extent of doping in Russian athletics and turned a blind eye to it. The head of the anti-doping agency made the claim that the amount of doping in Russia, had been so extensive that the government could not have been unaware of it.
That claim was being made, after the Head of the International Athletic Agency, who is himself implicated in this “extensive” system of accepting money in return for, ignoring “positive” results against Russian athletes, has resigned from his position with the Olympic Games organisation, yet his closest ally on the IAAF, the Jew Sebastian Coe, was supposedly, completely unaware of it. Do I smell a rat?
When similar problems cropped up at FIFA, the entire team fell under suspicion, including Michel Platini, who was in fact employed by UEFA, yet he is being investigated for having been paid, in return for work he had carried out on behalf of FIFA. There is now doubt about his position regarding the job at FIFA, when the reign of Blatter comes to an end. This would of course leave Blatter’s job available to a member of the Royal Zionist Family of Jordan, Prince Ali. Do I smell another rat?
I have carried out a quick search of the prevalence of doping in Athletics and Russia appears to be no more guilty than do many other States. The USA has had more top athletes banned as a result of doping at the Olympics than has Russia, which would suggest that the IOC has itself succumbed to the lure of cash for “caching” as it were.
So before going on International Television with a garbled list of unsubstantiated accusations, which are reminiscent of those, suggesting that Russia had paid FIFA, for the right to hold the World Cup, would it not be better to carry out a more substantial investigation of the problem itself, rather than to simply use allegations which were made on a television programme as an excuse to go after Russia?
Sky News presented the WADA accusations against Russia as the most important News of the Day. More important than that of Jew, David Cameron’s diatribe, which he delivered from “The Heart of Darkness” the London Headquarters of the Red Shield Over Europe, Chatham House’s, Royal Institute of International Affairs, which had no doubt prepared his innocuous speech.
Cameron prattled on, making much ado about nothing, endeavouring to give the impression that he was going in for the kill. He was going to screw the maximum of benefits for the UK out these discussions. The “outcry” was immediate. The other members of the EU will not accept these sort of demands, which attack the very foundations of the Union. Which of course they will finally accept, giving Cameron the opportunity to claim that he had fulfilled all of his promises and then they can rig the result of the Referendum.