A Call From The Garrigue.

The Alternative View Slides Back Into The Mainstream

 

 

 

Joel Skouson, a guest on Rense Radio, did today relate a tale of the Sandy Hook hoax,which was completely at odds with the tale which Rense and Jim Fetzer, a broadcaster on the Rense network, have agreed on for years. To my amazement Rense accepted every word of the Skouson version, which I found to be quite ridiculous, without a word of criticism.

 

Quite suddenly, a large number of the once sceptical sites on the Inter-Web, which in past times denounced all of the ‘terrorist’ attacks across Europe and the United States, as hoaxes or false flags, are now telling us that all of those attacks were, indeed carried out by Muslims, in order to reinforce, their new claim that those hoax/false flag, attacks are indeed perfectly true and are as a result of the open door policy for ‘refugees,’ whom arrive with terrorists hidden amongst them, instead of concentrating, not on Muslims but on ‘non-refugees’ whom are streaming in from Africa.

Refugees, should be given shelter until the time comes when they can return to their own country. To provide them with the right to permanent domicile in another country, is an unusual step, unless they would be at risk should they return home.

The United States and Britain had no problem about sending thousands of prisoners, both German and others, back into the hands of Stalin, knowing full well that they would be brutally tortured and killed. So what lies behind the current idea that all of the member states of the European Union, the United States, Australia, New Zealand and Canada are obliged, under threat, to rehouse millions of ‘refugees’ in White Christian Countries?

Why, on the other hand, has there been no universal uproar against the Jews in Israel, whom instantly deport all of the ‘infiltrators’ into Israel, back to whichever country from which they came? After all, it is mainly Jews whom are demanding that we Europeans accept millions of Muslims into our midst, why not do the same thing, which they so stridently propose for us? Let us be quite clear about it, Israel is too Jew, is it not?

There are a couple of million Syrian refugees in Turkey and when hostilities end, one way or another they will find their way back to Syria, so why is it such a problem for Europe to repatriate refugees back to their homelands?

The British have been promising to reduce immigration into a country, which is already the most densely populated country in Europe, without success and yet Poland and Hungary have both managed to restrict immigration to zero, in recent times, so how was this achieved? Could it be simply because they do not want immigrants? Should that be the case how are they managing to survive, while Britain needs, in the order of three-hundred- thousand immigrants a year just to keep up with the need of fruit pickers?

The answer must lie somewhere in the actions of all political parties across Europe, where all of the governments in recent times, have been prepared to destroy their own countries, by inviting the enemy to set up house, within the castle walls. Strangely, Merkel is a Jew, Cameron is a Jew, Hollande and Sarkozy are Jews I wonder if there can be any connection between that and Muslim and Black immigration into Europe, and the plan to homogenised Europeans out of existence, as proposed by the founders of the European Union?

The British People make a point of blaming their victims for the crimes which they carried out. It was the British government, which having dismissed, the ‘appeaser’ Neville Chamberlain, set about trapping the German people, through the use of ‘controlled terrorism’ against ethnic Germans in the Sudetenland, and having encouraged Hitler to save them, used his humanitarian act, as an excuse to bomb Germany into the stone-age, as they say, slaughtering, without a qualm, twenty-million German people in the process..

The weight of the guilt of the British and their Allies, is so great, that here we are, seventy years on, still bad-mouthing Adolf Hitler, who was in fact their ‘victim,’ in order to justify their crime.

They more recently used exactly the same tactic, to ensnare, Gadaffi in Libya and now Assad in Syria, both of whom they describe as ‘brutal dictators.’ While just as they did at Nuremberg, where they implicated the Germans in alleged atrocities, without any evidential back-up, they are now accusing Russia and Donald Trump of all and everything, without a shred of evidence in support, while all around there is to be found a ton of evidence of the barbarity of the British and the Americans along with their rulers in Israel.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s