Top BBC man Garth Ansier, has been outed to the FBI in this exposé. I suppose this information, which has been available since 2000 was forwarded to the BBC, however, having spent many hours researching this subject, I have not come across his name, as being yet another BBC Paedophile.
Before the New Year has been celebrated, the BBC has already introduced us to its intention of continuing the deception of the Public.
Steve Jones, a man whom considers himself to be an academic, whose opinion should be accepted, without question and whose advice has already been taken up by the BBC, on matters of reporting science news, has now informed the BBC audience, that should he have his way, it would become unnecessary to present an opposing point of view, to that of his own. He described the opposing position as “madcap,” likely to present a false balance, in any discussion such as Man Made Global Warming, where he tells us that “The Science is Settled.”
However it was noticeable, that in keeping with current parlance, he spoke not of Global Warming, but of Climate Change. One is obliged to ask of him, in a subject which was “settled,” why the change? Could it be because there has been no sign of Global Warming, for the last fifteen years?
Jones is also an Evolutionist, whom along with others, would like to see all opposing points of view banned. He signed a petition, which sought to refuse Pope Benedict the right of a visit to the UK. He has also suggested, in all seriousness, that Religious people should be banned from Medical Practice. He is of the opinion that only Evolutionists, should be taken seriously.
So where does that lead us? Where does that leave me? Would Jones suggest that I must accept all of the unsubstantiated rubbish, which he and those like him, would force down the throats of a gullible public, or risk a prison sentence, as is the case with the unsubstantiated tale of the holocaust? Will he soon be calling for restrictions against Bloggers?
What Jones is up to, has nothing to do with Science, it has more to do with manipulation. When it suited the manipulators, they presented us with “God.” A God with a fierce and cruel disposition and should we transgress, we would be condemned to Hell.
To modify the belief in this God, in no way undermines the ideas of the Creationists, it merely removes the image of a being resembling Barry Gibbs of the Bee Gees, sitting in a big chair, with the idea that things are not quite as we thought they were.
Evolutionism, has no more support in reality, than does Creationism. Those like Jones, whom seek to enlighten children away from a belief in the super-natural, are still madly searching for the proof of their own “theories.”
However, real science and the ideas of Quantum Physics, which support the “theories” of plusieurs dimensions and levels of existence and a reassessment of time itself, are leaving the Luddites, such as Jones, way behind in the Science of the Meaning of Life.
The BBC presenter, made no effort whatsoever to take Jones to task. No mention of the lies, which were told by the Climate Research Unit, in order to bolster up the bogus claims of “warming,” which of course was completely ignored by the BBC, which sat on the released E Mails, and have never discussed them. Is this what Jones would call a “Madcap” idea? Jones has described Creationism as anti-science, would he therefore describe his acceptance of CRU lies, as part of the legitimate scientific process?
While those of us, whom are still travelling along the road towards enlightenment, Jones is part of the vanguard of opposition, attempting to prevent the awakening of the masses. He is indeed part of the problem. He will never discover a satisfactory proof of his theory of Evolution, he will however, continue to present it as fact.
The BBC, has persistently given this man a platform, from which to present his false doctrines, none of which have been proven beyond doubt and none of which stand up to scrutiny. Any request for an explanation of even the tiniest of questions concerning Evolution, are ignored. The BBC has ominously, put many of his editorial beliefs into practice.
For example, there has been discovered a tiny creature, which moves itself around with a form of propeller, which is powered by a form of elastic band, which in turn has need of a system to wind the elastic band. How can the need of all three of these devices, in order to make a viable creature, be accounted for by Evolution? How did the creature survive during the millions of years necessary to “evolve” all three devices? Questions such as these will be lodged in a dark place, like the CRU E Mails.
What we are coming to understand, is that there is no substance to life. It is becoming more and more clear that all is an illusion. What we have yet to discover, is what powers this illusion. The biggest obstacle to this search, is the continued misdirection of those such as Jones, whom are so sure of their own credibility or perhaps, so well paid to misdirect the rest of us, that they would glue us in the past and try to prevent a massive revolt, against those, whom for Centuries, have controlled us with lies.
The weasel words of Neville Chamberlain are not only simple lies, they were the means of unleashing a war which had been in the planning for twenty years. In the words of Chamberlains successor, the evil Winston Churchill, “Hitler was not the target, Germany was.” The Jews in the City of London and in New York, had lined Germany up for the mincing machine in Nineteen-Thirty-Three.
However the conspiracy was far more evil than that, just as in Nineteen-Seventeen, during the Great War, which was yet another unnecessary war, which was laid at the feet of Germany, the Jews, including hundreds from New York, Trotsky amongst them, had already prepared the launching of a revolution in Russia. Now, having manoeuvred Hitler into a treaty with Stalin, which was supposed to take Hitler’s eye off the ball, they ordered Poland to attack Germany, which provoked the desired response from Hitler.
The City of London had long been planning to extend their Russian Empire, across the whole of Western Europe. In order to facilitate this, they had Stalin’s Red Army poised at the Polish border, waiting for the declaration of war.
Hitler it was, whom spoiled the party, by fighting the Red Army to a standstill. They were saved by the illegal intervention of Roosevelt, whom supplied arms and air support to the Russians.
Despite Hitler’s efforts to save Europe, half of Germany and all of Eastern Europe, was simply given to the Jewish Communists by the three Jewish Communists whom had controlled the war, Churchill, Stalin and Roosevelt.
Chamberlain, in his broadcast to the British people, forgot to mention that as Hitler entered Poland from the West, Stalin came in from the East. Why then did France and Britain not declare war on Russia? Because the Treaty with Poland was simply a ploy to entrap Hitler, the British or French cared not a hoot for the Polish people.
All of this is old news, this is well understood by those whom have studied just a little tiny bit of history. I have repeated this tale in many different posts for some time now.
Chamberlain’s speech on the above clip, is no different from that of Reagan, excusing the Iran Contra Affair, which I believe can be found here. They are liars one and all.
The BBC, which transmitted Chamberlain’s Declaration of War, understood that they were a part of the plot to initiate a brutal war. Europe had hardly recovered from the carnage of the Great War and yet here was the City of London’s Bolshevik Bankers demanding another one.
Those same Bolshevik Bankers are now lining us up for yet another blood-letting. The BBC is on hand to take care of the lies and propaganda to make sure that their masters get their desired result.
These hidden hands have quite deliberately provoked bloodshed and strife all across the Middle East and now Africa, to feed their insatiable greed and thirst for blood sacrifice, while the BBC calmly feeds us lies and other rubbish, in exactly the manner that they fed us lies about Hitler and Germany, while the real monsters were coming out of Russia, where sixty-five-million Christians were put to death in unspeakable ways by Jewish killers.
Assad in Syria has held elections, why did the BBC not report on this event? Why does the BBC not pose the question as to where the authority, to install a group of unelected people as the government of Syria, without reference to the desire of the Syrian people come from?
Why does the BBC not report the presence of British paid Al Qaeda in Syria? They know that Al Qaeda is part of the CIA because it was in a BBC documentary “The Power of Nightmares.”
Why has Wild Willy Hague, not been asked to explain, in simple terms, why he is in Mali, lending support to a Military Junta, whom overturned the Democratically elected regime? From whom did he receive the right to say that he, ‘wants Assad out of power,’ and why should Assad give a toss what Hague wants?
I think it would be fair to say that the BBC is part of the Shadow Government. They are a completely biased organisation and in view of the lies and deceit, which is part of current News reporting, we can only ask the question, “Is there any truth whatsoever in the vilification of Adolf Hitler and what is the truth of his behaviour during the Second World War?”
The British and US versions of the News is a pack of lies. No trust can be placed in anything which they report. Personally speaking I am a Sandy Hook Denier, if for no better reason than the fact that despite all of the discrepancies in the official tale, neither the BBC or Sky News have even mentioned that things do not add up. They have both reported the “Gun Grabbers,” preferred version of events.
No effort has been made or any desire shown to speak to bereaved parents, nor have they given any indication as to the identity of Lanza’s mother, whom we were told he had shot, nor any description of Lanza’s life in Sandy Hook, where his mother was a teacher and then was not a teacher, there are enough discrepancies in that lot to cast doubt on all of the mainstream media reporting. So is that the purpose of the BBC and others like them, to bamboozle us into a stupor?
Judging by the amount of air time given to Justin Bieber’s late arrival at the O2 arena last night, one could be forgiven for thinking that the News Editors have a good idea of the mentality of those to whom they are speaking.
However, the reality for the average European at this time, is to be assured by the media that the world is warming, even as it cools, that there is a shortage of oil, even as BP is pumping Iraqi oil at two dollars a barrel, while the BBC tells us that the price at the pumps represents the price of one hundred-dollar plus per barrel.
So just as during the days of Empire, whether French or English, all of the profits are falling into the same pockets, while the BBC completely misrepresents the current fiscal difficulties, ignoring the growing poverty of the British people, while being left to carry out an investigation into the rampant child abuse at the BBC.
There would now appear to be such a void, between the mainstream and reality, that it has become impossible to be anything other than confused, by the topics of the day, with which we are presented by the disinformation arm of the British Establishment.
While the BBC is itself under scrutiny because of the manner in which it covered up the antics of the Rock Brigade under serial paedophile Jimmy Savile, they now find themselves in the role of interrogator, into the sexual deviancy within the higher ranks of the Lib-Dem’s a member of the governing coalition, and in particular, as with the BBC’s own transgressions, what was known and what action was taken. The BBC can hardly be described as being fit to ask such questions, to which they themselves have as yet given no proper reply.
As with the sordid tale of Savile, and the Newsnight programme which was cancelled, the BBC has just announced the airing of yet another case of serious child abuse in Afghanistan, which like Libya has been handed over to the thugs and Drug Barons with a “Democratically,” elected leader, whom rigged the vote but was put into power anyway, “because of the lack of time to hold another election before winter.” A winter which was apparently the longest on record, as after two or three years there is still no sign of an election.
There was once again no mention of Bahrain, Mali, Spain, Bulgaria or Libya, in fact the list of omissions was endless. We were treated to a long and annoying account of Daniel Day-Lewis’s win at the Oscars and his proud admission that he not only remained in character on the set and all through the days of filming but even at home. Imagine living with that?
The nearest thing to a discussion of the parlous state of the British and European economies, was an interview with a thief, whom makes his living buying and selling money, which in any decent political system, should be considered as a crime.
The tone of the BBC, as far as financial affairs are concerned, is in keeping with that of Sky News, CNN, Fox News and whatever other News outlet you care to mention. There is no in-depth study of the system itself, which is always presented as sacrosanct.
The Peoples of Europe and of course the rest of the Western World, are kept in the dark, as to the real cause of the fiscal problem. The BBC is a publicly funded organisation, unlike Sky News or any of the others, which can claim the right or indeed the obligation to present the views of those whom own, control and pay the staff.
The BBC however, should present all sides of a problem and yet it never does. Which would suggest that the people of the UK are paying to be deceived. I could quite easily express a solution to the current state of affairs, which would never be given an airing on the BBC. That is the measure of the depth of control, which a hidden hand, holds over the head of the organisation.
The first step in this attempt to improve the miserable situation of the deprived masses of Europe, is to wake up to the obvious. The people must be made to see what Europe has now become. There are areas with thirty per cent unemployment, in a Union which was supposed to make us all rich. It has failed and no amount of tampering will change a thing. The reason I can present this with such surety, is because this failure comes as no surprise to those whom brought it about.
The way the world operates is quite simple. It is based on two basic ideas, money and greed. Nothing more.
It is well understood that unchecked Capitalism, will mean, that everything will end up in the same hands.
Take a good look around you, it is already clear that the money system has been cornered. It is claimed that there are eight banking families, whom have the world-wide control of the printing of money.
The BBC will never disclose the holder of the British debt, because to do so would lay bare the criminality of any government, which is prepared to rob and starve its people, in order to give their money to sharks, whom pay no taxes and whom are in fact, responsible for every war during the last hundred years.
The system of government, which is presented as an example to the whole-wide world, as the best possibility to protect the Rights of Man, Democracy, is in fact simply the preferred system of control.
The simplest way to grasp this sad fact is to understand the meaning of the saying, “It doesn’t matter for whom you vote, the government always wins.”
For example, in Italy a new Political Party has entered the arena. They are proposing to carry on with exactly the same system which has destroyed Italy and robbed its people, however they will do it in a slightly different way. As did the Con-Dem-Lib alliance in the UK. They of course, are blaming the previous Socialist regime, for all of the UK’s problems, which is quite obviously total garbage, yet the Socialists keep mum and go along with the game.
The coalition has had a complete success, which gives a false impression of failure. They have continued the destruction of the UK, where successive governments have privatised just about all of the Utilities, exported a large chunk of industrial production overseas and flooded the country with immigrants, whom now roam the streets of London declaring neighbourhoods to be Sharia Law zones.
The finance minister has declared his intention to carry on with austerity measures, which will always be necessary as long as there is a large number of unemployed people needing support and no investment in productive jobs, which would generate more taxes to pass to the bankers.
Everybody understands this, to pretend otherwise is a waste of time, the object is to bring the UK to is knees.
When governments are expressing surprise, that their economies have suddenly taken a nose dive, while at the same time Free Trade agreements which they have entered into, are allowing trillions of Euros, Dollars and Pounds to be paid to China in return for rubbish, money which miraculously, on arrival in China goes straight into the pockets of the elite, whom are the folk whom financed the Chinese miracle in the first place, it becomes clear for whom our politicians are working. Europe is being drained of funds.
The real and well understood trap of Democracy, is the system of Political Parties, the leaders and upper echelons of which can be bought, blackmailed or murdered. In the US and UK, two political groups take it in turn to govern. One of the two, will initiate a regime of controls, which will be criticised by the other, but which will remain on the books, whomsoever takes the reins.
Any wonders which are promised during elections go by the board when the election has been won. Which is why Manifestos should be made legally binding documents. A change which will never be carried out by politicians, but which could be insisted on in local constituencies.
Now let us take a look at the monetary system. Imagine what you could do, should you find yourself in the position, where for example, France was paying you seventy-two billion Euros a year, the UK probably roughly the same, Italy, Greece, Spain and all of the other members of the EU all paying similar amounts, all in all, hundreds of billions of Pounds, and Euros and all of this money was being passed to you for nothing, no gold or silver or jewels, simply in return for the click of a mouse.
Now calculate what a transformation could be made in Europe, if all of this money remained in the hands of the people whom had worked to generate this wealth, instead of passing it into the hands of leeches and other parasites, whom use it to destroy us in unnecessary wars and make us sick with the foodstuffs which they force us to consume.
This is not fantasy, this is exactly what is happening. The money is used amongst other things to pay off politicians, every Congressman and Senator in the US is a millionaire. We, the workers generate all of this wealth and our elected politicians just hand it over to a cartel of criminals.
The Stock Exchanges of the world, generate no wealth, they are simply a system to steal the wealth which has been generated by us. Any financial millionaire, whom deposits a million Dollars or whatever, in an overseas bank account, has stolen that money out of the pockets of suckers, they too are parasites.
By now I hope that I have made it clear that the present system is repulsive, because it passes most of the money towards the same pockets, this is exactly what it is intended to do. Every penny which is earned by the poor is taken from them by dozens of taxes and other forms of theft. Every cent of Income Tax, which the deluded people imagine pays for roads and other public works, is in fact paid directly to the private bankers.
All of this could be changed overnight. All it would take is the courage to do it. The banks could be Nationalised, after which they could just carry on as now but without the usury. The debt could then be put to its proper use, to improve the welfare of the working man. However this will never be done by the clowns whom pretend to govern us at the moment. They will have to go, one and all and a group of decent men and women should be elected with a mandate to carry out these changes. That, unfortunately is where the dream begins.
Lord McAlpine, whom was named as one of a group, whom abused children in the North Wales Paedophile Scandal, has received one hundred and eighty-five thousand pounds in damages from the BBC, in an out of Court settlement, because he claimed that their reference to a name which could be found on-line, was in some way libellous.
We were told that the BBC agreed to pay this sum, in order to avoid litigation. On what grounds would this case be based? The BBC did not name McAlpine, it was the North Wales Police whom named McAlpine, to a youngster whom had been abused.
There has been no sign of the actual photograph, which had been shown to the boy and the name of the person has not been divulged. We have been left to guess as to whether the identity of the suspect in the photo was a relative of McAlpine, whom has been implicated in the sordid affair but whom is now dead, or maybe it is yet another Toff, whom may have been amongst the alleged offenders, whom could possibly sue the BBC in turn. McAlpine is not the only alleged possible offender, whose name may well have been on-line for years. Does McAlpine have proof positive that he was targeted more than others, when the BBC suggested that “a name” could be found on-line?
I get the impression, that the BBC has paid a large sum of Licence Payers money to give the impression that with or without evidence, without any proper enquiry, that a man whom was named by the Police in Wales, is innocent.
Perhaps I need straightening out on the twists and turns in the law of libel. Personally I found it difficult to pin down a direct reference to Lord McAlpine and the abused boy, whom is now a man. It was not until his name appeared in the Press that I became aware that it was he. So why is the BBC paying?
Now we know that all it took for my brother Lord (Alistair) McAlpine to be exonerated as a paedophile was for the victim Steven Messham to be shown a photograph of his alleged abuser. (These are the words of Sir William McAlpine, the brother of the cousin of the man, whom it is now being suggested, was the real paedophile, whose photograph was shown to Steve Messham by the police during an investigation of child abuse.)
A friend of mine once told me how all it took to avoid being charged with a speeding offence, was a neatly folded ten pound note inside his driving licence.
Sir William made no reference whatsoever to the sexual orientation of his nephew, Jimmie McAlpine, or offered any better reason for the alleged mistake by Meesham, whom may well have forgotten the first name of his abuser, but he did in fact get the right family name, which in itself is odd, than that it was no more than a case of mistaken identity.
Jimmie McAlpine, is now dead, so it matters little should the family choose to besmirch his memory, by suggesting that he was the guilty abuser. Or is it being suggested by Sir William, that he could have told the police, had they bothered to ask, that no member of his family, would take part in such loathsome behaviour. McAlpine Inc. was at the time busily desecrating North Wales, quarrying for Slate. So apparently we no longer need Court Trials, the word of a rich Toff should suffice.
Once again the BBC is in the dock. My mind goes back to the disgraceful sacking of Greg Dyke and Andrew Gilligan, for in effect, telling the truth about the Blair Government, which is of course taboo on the BBC. After the furore had calmed down, they were both vindicated by subsequent events.
I listened to John Humphrys driving into Entwistle, the recently resigned DG, demanding whether he ever read the papers or listened to the News? I found this quite amusing coming from Humphrys, whom has never asked such a question of any politician in Government in all of his years at the Beeb. I have memories of his interview of Jonathan Sacks, the Chief Rabbi, when he was quite obviously warned to leave off Gaza. The Rabbi himself was unctuous to the point of embarrassment.
However the same question could well be asked of Sir William McAlpine, concerning his nephew, whom he employed in the Wrexham locale, is he saying he had not seen or heard any reference to the exploits of Jimmie, which were well-known to the local police? Which would account for the photo which it is now being claimed, was the actual photo, which was shown to Messham at the time and later destroyed. Did he have no curiosity whatsoever about how this mistake could have occurred? Or indeed if it was not Jimmie, who the hell was it?
When the original disclosure, concerning the behaviour of Jimmy Savile started to surface, everything was fine, the airwaves were full of it, Savile was, after all, nothing more than an awkward, inarticulate buffoon, whom had been given plum jobs which he did not merit, to the bafflement of most intelligent viewers.
The BBC, maybe unknowingly, did the right thing for the “Establishment,” when they chose to ignore it or stifle it, take your pick. However one of the commercial TV channels got a hold of it, which led on to the Blogosphere, where the real journalists lurk and hey presto! the seething filth of the Establishment was laid bare.
Thanks to little snitches like Humphrys, the people are never told the truth. For example, where was Humphrys during the Kincora Scandal, did he attempt to dig out the British paedophiles involved in that one? Where are the disclosures of the antics of Lord Mountbatten. Where is the truth of Churchill, whom was adored by the BBC and of course, the “Grocer,” Ted Heath.
Entwistle is, like Greg Dyke before him, the sacrificial lamb, being slaughtered to calm down the whole affair and put it back in the box and not on the box. The object of all this Cinema, is to make sure that nothing else concerning High Society paedophilia will be broached on the BBC. Why else would the BBC become the story, as they say, while the victims are once again being sacrificed to save the criminals.
Will the likes of Humphrys be pushing for an enquiry into the destruction of relevant evidence, which was part of the Messham accusation in the first pace. How can a satisfactory decision be made about the McAlpine role in the affair without the necessary evidence? Should not the BBC be setting up an investigative team to look into the destruction of relevant evidence, particularly as it comes hot on the heels of the Hillsborough Scandal?
We are dealing with extremely rich and powerful people, whom are well used to double-dealing in their business affairs and “Lobbying,” which is code for bribing is all part of the game. Many victims have been paid off down through the years, allowing the guilty to avoid the law. Unfortunately many of the guilty are members of the Law and Judiciary themselves.
It would appear on the surface that Entwistle was ambushed. Perhaps there is something else behind this whole load of rubbish. The BBC did not name Lord McAlpine, it is true that there are many references to him online but it is unfair to suggest that the “Newsnight” suggestion that those interested could find references there, was in some way responsible for those references being there. I would suggest that those references would have surfaced anyway.
After the sacking of Dyke, a Jew Michael Grade was put in charge, during his first Press Conference, The Jerusalem Post asked Grade whether he would be removing Orla Guerin from her post in Gaza. He said he would not, Guerin however was soon sent to Rhodesia.
The next choice, Mark Thompson, was married to a Jew, which gives him Jewish children, Thompson was a frequent visitor to Israel, he is now in line for a job with the Jewish controlled media in the US. It will be interesting to see whom will replace Entwistle.