The ‘failed’ policy of ‘Open Borders’ into Europe, having already allowed entry into most of the member States of the European Union, huge numbers of unvetted immigrants, has now been declared to have been a failure, when in fact it has been a huge success, which has allowed ‘controlled’ puppets like Angela Merkel, to do the dirty work of the Zionists, by allowing a huge number of mainly Black, fighting age men, whom are being taken out of Africa, sitting rigidly, close together, all wearing the same type of orange life-jackets, in large Zodiac type rubber boats, without water to drink or food to eat, with no toilet facility available, making it perfectly clear, that they did not leave Libya, expecting to cross the sea to Italy, sitting in a boat, which could be instantly capsised by a small wave, or by someone taking a quick crap over the side, they knew full well, that the Ferry was waiting to take them to Italy, no more than a couple of kilometres offshore. These Black men are a real and present danger to Europe. The raping has already started even the gang raping of young boys.
That version of ‘the news’ is a good illustration of how the ‘News’ with which we are presented on a daily basis, is contrived to convince the hard-of-thinking of one thing, while ignoring the most important element of the tale, which is, that no Government, worthy of the name, would calmly pursue such a catastrophic policy, knowing full well that the majority of all of Europe’s Peoples, given free choice, would refuse to allow this mass immigration stupidity. So who gave these ‘servants’ the power to destroy us? Personally I would have never agreed to allow these idiots free rein, to take hold of this power, which they have grabbed out of our hands, by having misled children in school, as to how to make Democracy work for the People and not for the psychopaths. Even in school as children, we were being indoctrinated by traitors and their dupes, whom had also been educated to believe that the status quo was the right way and the only way.
Another hoary old subject, which nobody appears willing to explain in simple language, is the subject of inflation and its causes. ‘Monetizing the debt’ is a mantra which suggests the through the sale of Government Bonds, which are ‘sold’ to Central Banks, which allows those Central Banks, which are all privately owned, to ‘print money’ into the economy, which is without ‘collateral support.’ This allows our Politicians to ‘pretend’ to have created an inflationary debt, which is payable to the Private Bankers, whom created it out of thin air and in order to continue to pay this ‘debt,’ they must increase taxes, which means increasing taxes on beer and cigarettes and causing price rises on other needs by increasing Value Added Taxes.
This form of robbery, is best illustrated through the use of debt incurred by house-buyers, whom had need of a loan from these crooked bankers, whom have used crooked money, to take control of the old-fashioned Building Societies, which made loans to those buying or building their home, Societies which were obliged to loan out no more than the total of the money deposited by members of the Society.
The moment that it became possible for those earning the average wage to consider buying their own home, the price of a home escalated to ridiculous heights, which finally made it necessary for husband and wife to work, in order to pay off the debt, which could once have been paid off using one salary.
This debt was a false debt, printed by a High Street bank, out of nothing, which in simple terms is ‘printing money’ a fact which has never been outed, by those whom claim that printing money has been the cause of inflation, simply because the house price inflation had nothing to do with the money available to buy a house and everything to do with the deliberate shortage of houses to buy.
This fact is well-known to politicians, whom have conspired with Bankers, whom have cynically robbed house-buyers, through the use of excessive interest rates on those loans, interest which in most cases amounted to more than the original value of the home and which allowed the banks to milk the debtor for half of the period of the ‘Mortgage’ and should the debtor fall on hard times, they had the right to seize the home, in payment of this non-existent debt. Houses are now so expensive that to charge a high rate of interest would financially cripple even the moderately rich, which is why interest rates are so low for savers at his time.
This ‘interest’ scam has also meant that the value of a house has increased relentlessly, as it actually cost the buyer an extortionate amount of ‘stolen’ money, which he would need as a deposit to buy his next overvalued home.
Back in 2008, when the housing debt was used as the excuse to pay untold billions of Dollars to the Bankers, which was the most colossal ‘governmental fraud’ in history, I argued that governments should have given the money to the mortgage holder, which they could have paid to the bank, which could have allowed them to remain in their homes, however the disgusting, controlled politicians, without any form of proof that there was indeed any ‘real’ debt, simply handed over our money to the criminal bankers, for whom they work.
We were all suddenly swamped with terms like ‘Derivatives’ and ‘Credit Default Swaps’ and other such rubbish, in an attempt to conceal this Grand Larceny, by inferring that ‘packages of bad debt’ had been over-sold or that insurance claims, against this debt would be overwhelming, therefore the Governments of the World must pay up. It was all a load of pap. If there had been any debt, it was no more than debt in a game of Poker, there is always someone at the table, who is holding all the money, whether that money is in bank-notes or plastic chips, it is never lost and if the ‘winner’ is found to have cheated, he could have all of his fingers broken, and all of his ‘winnings’ seized.
Only in tiny Iceland, were the Bankers made to pay for their crime, while across Europe, we were introduced to ‘austerity measures’ which was no more than a means of funding all of the illegal wars across the Middle East, by extracting funds from Social needs to pay the Banker controlled Armament Industry, billions of Dollars for the ways and means of murdering ‘their’ enemies, while already concocting the next load of crap, open door immigration, coupled with the fable of the ‘homecoming terrorist’.
In Ireland, from where the people have been forced, through poverty, to seek work abroad, the Irish are now being ordered by an unelected self congratulated sodomite Taoiseach, that they are obliged to plunge themselves into an unimaginable debt of billions of Euros, in order to allow one million Sub-Saharan Blacks, to set up home in Ireland, in free housing and with all other needs on demand, with the promise of a job, which it is already impossible to provide for those whom are already homeless and jobless in Ireland.
These things do not come out of the blue. If this is allowed, it will be the end of Ireland. In this emergency situation, what has become of the Irish Republican Army, which should they be sincere patriots and not tools of the British, should be standing in opposition to this attempt to annihilate the White Irish Cristian Community? The other dirty little secret in Ireland is the hidden hand of those whom have special laws which apply only to them.
A while back I decided to put the idea of the “freedom of speech and expression” to the test. Sadly, as with most popular misconceptions, it is a rare commodity. In my own sphere, I soon discovered that this “freedom” involves the full acceptance of all current stupidities, while to do otherwise leaves you open to derision.
My problems started, when during a coffee-time discussion about the French involvement in the destruction of Libya, an affable young lad suggested that these sort of problems could be better solved through the medium of love.
In all innocence I asked him to explain what he meant. The silence which fell over the group was palpable but in my new incarnation of upholder of the “Rights of Man” I pressed on.
I asked him if he felt uncomfortable with my question and if yes, was I now under an attack of love and if so, how was he doing it. I could sense that most of the other folk at the table were in support of the sentiments of this fable of love. They were part of a group of people who hold to the idea of love conquering all, while at the same time they can offer no convincing explanation as to why they are mostly divorced.
For some time after, most of the group, including the “love man” refused to speak to me, such is love. This all changed for a short period when a young girl had her bag and wallet stolen putting her into a bit of a hole. I made a spontaneous collection for her, to help her out, which, awkwardly, reinstated me into every bodies good books, but only for a short period.
My next transgression was on the day when there was a marriage in the Town Hall. I noticed that the guests, who were gathering outside, included a large number, whom though they looked like women, were in fact dressed like men.
I asked a fellow, whom I have known for years, if this was a Gay Wedding? He immediately called me a Fascist. I asked him what he meant. His response absolutely floored me. He suggested that I should not have even noticed that there was any difference between the Gay couple who were getting married and any heterosexual couple.
That was more than enough for me, as far as I was concerned that sort of stupidity qualified him as a verifiable cretin. I asked him how that made me a Fascist? He started to mumble something about Hitler’s hatred of homosexuals, so I asked him what a hatred of homosexuals had to do with being a Fascist?
I have noticed for some time that the actual meaning of Fascism has long been swamped out of existence and has been misrepresented as being a form of oppression, favoured, of course, by cruel Dictators.
I made a remark along the lines of, most of the crimes which have been laid at the door of Hitler, have never been proven. I asked him if he could point me towards a piece of evidence of Hitler’s attacks against homosexuals. Apparently, like love, it is all around us and like love it can ever be produced in support of claims which are continually made of it.
The fellow started to tell me that there was all the evidence of the Shoah, in support of what he was suggesting. When I pointed out that most of the evidence of the Shoah was so insecure, that in the end it could not have been the truth as all of the claims which were made in the past, have had to be revised. There is no need to revise the truth.
At which point, he warned me that if I continued in this manner, denying the Shoah, he would not be speaking to me again. When I put it to him that if I was obliged to believe something, was it not up to him to show me proof of the actuality of the event, in which I was meant to believe, otherwise it was no more than a religion and was he suggesting that I was not allowed to choose my own beliefs?
That was the end of the conversation and to this day, not one word has passed between us.
So where are we now? Love, Gay Marriage and the holocaust, that leaves us with that other hot potato, immigration.
Just a few days ago, yet another long time “friend” became agitated when I asked her opinion about the current level of immigration.
Her response was that there was no problem with immigration. When I asked her to explain to me the point at which it would become necessary to say that France was full, just like all of the other “really nice people” who can see no problem with the huge influx of immigrants into France, she was afraid to commit herself to any limit on immigration, when common sense suggests that there must be some limit, France cannot accept six or seven billion people.
At which point it becomes clear that most people fail to see the difference between economic immigrants and refugees or asylum seekers, intent on escaping the threat of torture or death in their homeland.
I asked her what was supposed to happen to the million or more young Muslim lads, living in the Banlieue de Paris whom had never been able to find a job. She had no answer. I asked her if she was happy about Paris being already more than fifty per-cent immigrant. She responded saying that all of the bigger cities in France were the same, but that was no problem.
When I suggested that immigrants were more likely than the French to have large families, she became aggressive with me, calling me racist and all the other insults, because the notion of immigrants having large families was a lie which was being put about by the Front Nationale.
When I suggested that most statistics showed that immigrants were having at least twice as many babies as were the French she was disgusted with the suggestion.
I told her that Irish people are renowned for their large families and that I have never heard of anybody suggesting that it was Racist or Fascist or anything else to suggest that this was the case, so why was there a problem to suggest that others might be the same?
I put it to her that she appeared to be saying that nobody had the right to question mass immigration and that when groups like Ukip in the UK or the Front Nationale in France stood up and said that enough is enough, they were going to be smeared and denigrated and anyone who agreed with them would be ostracised. At which point she said that if I continued along those lines she would not be speaking to me again.
The fact of the matter is that the United Kingdom and France should be prepared to accept whomsoever is trying to escape from Mali, Central Africa, Libya, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq, Syria, Sudan and wherever else, as they are responsible for the destruction of those countries and the creation of millions of refugees. So why should Europe decide that every country in Europe should take their share why not send them all to the UK and France?
Ireland has never invaded any country nor have the Irish people been responsible for world war-fare so why is Ireland under threat from a problem created by the British, French Americans and Israel?
It may have always been the same and it could be that in the past I have simply not noticed, but there are dozens of references made to the crimes of Hitler on a daily basis. Just yesterday I was confronted with my latest “free speech” issue. I was not even involved in the conversation which provoked it, I just happened to be standing near-by.
A fellow was babbling about the atrocities of Hitler and the Germans and I quietly asked him why it was that folk were forever attacking Hitler and yet they never said a word about Stalin, whom had slaughtered 65 million Christians. The man stiffened and I could see that he was going to have no sympathy for my remark.
For once I managed to keep my mouth shut, mainly because the man was a good sort and it was clear that he had a limited understanding of what had happened during the war.
So shamefully, it becomes clear that when the Jew François Hollande, is suggesting that to criticise Jews should be illegal, nobody is going to give a damn, any more than they will when the Jew Cameron makes Conspiracy Investigation illegal.
So what sort of Free Speech are we left with? What sort of Freedom and Human Rights are the immigrants in Ireland demanding? Are there Human Rights for Immigrants which are denied to the rest of us? Why are our governments, behind our backs, bringing in large numbers of immigrants in the first place.
My last point, I asked the woman who was in favour of Immigration, what she thought about the genocide against Whites in South Africa? Like many others, she felt that they had brought on themselves through their past actions.
When I suggested to her that the Boers had in fact been in South Africa before the Blacks, which had been a large empty space when they arrived three hundred or so years ago and that the Black were immigrants, looking for work.
She scoffed saying that it was ridiculous to suggest that Whites had been there before the Blacks. I refuted that claim, saying that Africa was a huge continent and most of the people were hunter gatherers of one form or another. leaving the vast prairies free for farming, for which the Boers used it.
I asked her if she felt that it was OK to call Africa a Black Mans Continent and if so what was Europe? Plus how she felt about the brutal attacks against BLACK asylum seekers in South Africa by the Rainbow People.
Did she agree with Israel expelling the Black Jew “infiltrators” into Israel and the lack of immigration into States which were not of European origin?
Nobody can answer these sort of questions because to do so would display the crass stupidity of their stance. So I think that in reality there is no such animal as true Freedom of Speech and when you have numb-heads telling me that it is racist to be able to distinguish Black from White and Male from Female it becomes clear that when even relatively intelligent people fail to understand how it should apply to the beliefs of others, things will get no better.