The Mafia God Fathers’ Rule The World
The latest branch of the British National Health Service to feel the strain, is the Ambulance Service and they confess that the problem is getting worse. Perhaps it is time to privatise it.
The British were well aware of the strain, under which all branches of the Health Service was operating, three years ago and very little has since changed.
It seems incredible, that during that same three-year period, one million immigrants have arrived in the United Kingdom, that is according to the Government’s net figure, the ‘real’ total could well be twice that figure, when you have an elected Government which is ‘conservative’ with the ‘official’ truth, who can tell what the ‘real’ truth could disclose.
To my knowledge there has been no investment made into the Health service, which could possibly have allowed for such an enormous increase in demand, and yet the United Kingdom is still obliged to allow entry to huge numbers of immigrants, mainly from outside of the European Union, while the media is concentrating the minds of the British public on European immigrants, mainly Polish people, while the largest group, by far and the group which is even more likely to remain, have come from India, from where a billion more would, most probably like to come. Being Polish White and Christian is now a barrier to immigration.
One thing is sure, Britain cannot produce enough foodstuffs, on British farms, to satisfy the needs of the people, whom are already established in the United Kingdom, which would lead to instant mass uproar and riots, across the Kingdom, should there be any interruption in the imports of produce from overseas.
While there is a government in place, which is unwilling to acknowledge that there is already a problem dealing with the sick and injured, because the health service is alrady over-stretched and that there are even now, hundreds of thousands of people in need of housing, that millions of people are in need of hand-outs from ‘food-banks’ to feed their family while the Government are insisting that it is more important to allow ever more people to enter the UK, to undertake the work, which the British, we are assured, refuse to do for themselves, without regard to the reality of the coming collapse of the system. The British people need to be seriously fearful of what lies behind this stupidity.
For such a small country, the level of immigration into the United Kingdom, has been at an unsustainable level, ever since the time that the population reached fifty-million. Britain has been the most densely populated country in Europe for decades, does the Government believe there to be no limit?
Even at the current level, to suggest that in order to suit the needs of ‘growth,’ that it was necessary to allow ever more people to enter the UK, when common sense and bitter past experience, demonstrates, that the industry which was used as the excuse to allow this immigration, could quickly go the way of all the others and simply vanish overseas as a result of political decisions.
The British people are at the moment witnessing the total control of the UK by an establishment, which can be used to deny the people their expressed choice, whenever they have need to so do.
The ‘People,’ have just been bamboozled into the belief that the ‘Law’ demands that the ‘Constitution’ be observed and that Parliament should now be allowed to ‘tell’ the British people what they will ‘get,’ whether it be what they voted for or not.
What they are ‘given,’ by their ‘servants’ whom are now telling the British that their ‘servants’ ‘Rule’ and a group of like-minded ‘servants,’ are going to tell them what is best for them.
You must of course ignore everything I say, because as a mere blogger, whatever I may say is being called fake news, however, despite that there are certain things which would suggest there to be, any number of holes in the Judgement made in the Supreme Court. All of which are being ignored.
Yesterday on the News, the cry from those whom voted to remain in the European Union, was one of, ‘That the Constitution must be observed and the law must be obeyed, Parliament must decide.’
That is all well and good, until you look for this ‘Constitution.’ Worryingly, there is no such document, and yet not one Member of Parliament has mentioned this ‘fact.’
So where is the ‘Law?’ As with the Constitution there is no ‘Law,’ all political Parties in the UK Parliament, ignore this fact, because all three are in the process of thwarting the decision of the people.
Right off the beam, it is clear that this is a stitch-up. Three of the Supreme Court Judges, were against the decision, this shouts out loud and clear, that there is no law. Had there been a law, Parliament would simply have abided by that Law.
So how was the decision in Court made? The decision was made under the leadership of David Neuberger, a Rothschild man. He was accompanied by a gaggle of staunch supporters of the European idea, some of whom had worked in the European Courts. By whom they were selected, I have no idea, most probably by Neuberger, Rothschild’s man.
They made their decision based on decisions which had been made in past centuries, which ‘could possibly’ be said to align with the need for a Parliamentary vote on Brexit. There was no decision which actually corresponded with the question of Brexit, as no such decision had ever been made.
The result was taken on the basis of ‘it’s close enough to suit our purpose.’ There is no ‘Law,’ involved, which is why three Judges voted against the decision. On such a serious decision, which flies full in the face of a decision made by those whom voted for Brexit, a majority verdict was surely the minimum acceptable decision and not a mere majority verdict.
The suggestion is already being made by British media, that Members of Parliament, should not necessarily abide by the decision of those by whom they were elected, and when they vote in Parliament, either in favour, or against, passing the Bill to allow Article 50 to go through, they should ignore the voters and instead vote with their ‘personal’ beliefs, which is exactly what they complained of in the US system.
This would suggest that in any future election, that a political manifesto can be loaded with a pack of lies without problem, there being no obligation to carry out any promises. Nothing much will change there.
This would mean that a Constituency Member should ignore the fact that his personal electorate voted to leave the EU and that should he hold the opposite position, he should vote against passing Article 50.
The same suggestion was not made that those members in Constituencies which had voted to remain in the EU, should now vote to leave, which demonstrates the total bias of the UK media, which has been busily extolling the idea that Clinton should be President of the USA because she had a ‘popular vote’ majority.
A claim which was itself a fake and Trumps decision to check out voter fraud in the election, will very quickly destroy this contrived tale, which was quite deliberately manipulated to generate unrest and Trumps announcement plunged the Fake media into a state of panic, worrying, that once more, their deceptions will be exposed.
The main cry in the Washington Women’s march was the claim that Clinton won the Popular Vote. You may have noticed from the clip at the top of the page, what that would have meant.
It is becoming horrifyingly more clear, as time goes by, that the hidden hand behind the throne, is of such a depth of evil, that neither the man in the street or indeed that person in public, would be prepared to accept the grim, grisly truth.
For example, would it surprise you to learn that there is Government approved organisation handling Drug Trafficking, Illegal Arms sales, International Paedophile Rings, the provision of children for adoption, the International Sex Worker Trade and the various groups whom organise Organ Harvesting, to provide the elderly rich with a new young heart on demand?
I would not be surprised, should you receive such information, in much the same manner as I did, that such things are supposedly, the territory of the Mafia. Well they are, it is simply our idea of exactly who the real Mafia is which is the problem.
That would give you an idea of what Donald Trump is dealing with, because even the Media, which is solidly against Trump, is owned by the same people. The last man who stood against them, in any meaningful manner, was Adolf Hitler, with whom the Fake Media, is even now comparing Donald Trump.
If for no better reason than this, it should be remembered that International Jewry declared war on Germany, as soon as Hitler was elected.
Adolf Hitler explained quite clearly, that the Jews did not want Israel as a place to live, they simply wanted their own Sovereign State, from where they would be out of reach of International Law and where they could set up an International Crimes Syndicate and a clearing house for the loot they gained from their criminal activities.
In the above clip, Hitler is pleading for peace, the Jews would have none of it. The position of Hitler, was the normal position for a European leader when confronted with the greed of the Jews, here is what my favourite author Mark Twain had to say about them.-
“In the U.S. cotton states, after the war… the Jew came down in force, set up shop on the plantation, supplied all the Negroes’ wants on credit, and at the end of the season was the proprietor of the Negro’s share of the present crop and part of the next one. Before long, the whites detested the Jew.
In all ages Christian Europe has been obliged to curtail his (the Jews) activities. If he entered upon a trade, the Christian had to retire from it. If he set up as a doctor, he took the business. If he exploited agriculture, the other farmers had to get at something else. The law had to step in to save the Christian from the poor-house. Still, almost bereft of employments, he found ways to make money. Even to get rich. This history has a most sordid and practical commercial look. Religious prejudices may account for one part of it, bit not for the other nine. Protestants have persecuted Catholics – but they did not take their livelihoods away from them. Catholics have persecuted Protestants – bit they never closed agriculture and the handicrafts against them. I feel convinced that the Crucifixion has not much to do with the world’s attitude toward the Jew; that the reasons for it are much older than that event … I am convinced that the persecution of the Jew is not in any large degree due to religious prejudice. No, the Jew is a money-getter. He made it the end and aim of his life. He was at it in Rome. He has been at it ever since. His success has made the whole human race his enemy.”