src=”https://www.youtube.com/embed/OBRiWcqMX6M” frameborder=”0″ allow=”autoplay; encrypted-media” allowfullscreen>
Whenever a perceived threat, to the total control of humanity, by the infamous ‘hidden hand’, makes an appearance, the first step is to undermine the character, of the perpetrator of that threat, by whatever means comes to hand. Hitler, when all else had failed, was said to be a ‘covert’ member of the ‘gang‘, working for the gang and what is more he had been Brainwashed by the British.
Donald Trump, who is using some of the verboten tactics of Hitler, is already being connected to certain figures, whose religion can most certainly be mentioned without fear, apart that is from in connection to membership, of that gang, a gang which could well be a threat to us all, while their identity must remain unspoken.
We the People, are now in a position, where to so much as mention a disparity in certain numbers, supplied by these people, which add up to the wrong answer, is soon to be forbidden. Should that advantage be allowed to apply to one and only one section of humanity, is a very strange notion indeed, and to be expected, not to so much as ask why that should be allowed, borders on insanity. They, the ‘special ones’ on the other hand, can make any claim, however false or fantastic against whomsoever they may choose, without fear of sanction. This is called freedom of speech? A freedom which will soon no longer apply to those like me or you, whom question certain things which do not add up, but a freedom which will be retained by those with a capacity to lie through their teeth about all and everything.
While efforts are continually being made, to connect those like Trump, with certain members of a gang-land group called the “Mafia” or “Cosa Nostra” the people whom have had virtual monopoly control of these groups, when once upon a time, hiding behind Italian sounding names and these days behind American sounding names, which have and are still being used to separate them from any connection to the “government”, while in other places names which were once changed to give the impression of being “Russian”, were chosen to hide the identity of those whom organised a coup d’etat in that country and whom are now lurking behind names which sound slightly Middle-Eastern, to give an impression of the same thing, when in fact both of these acts were what can only be described as being Non-Governmental-Organisation private wars, which the tax-payers of the world were forced to finance, using the newly installed private Income-Tax, which is a polite way of robbing the public for the benefit of the International Deep State.
South Africa is a classic example of the Deep State, which, in its grossly hypocritical mode of getting what it wants, endeavored to destroy yet another fully functioning, ‘White’ State, while pretending to be doing so for the benefit of an enormous immigrant population of Blacks, from all over Africa, Blacks whom against all odds were the richest Blacks on the African Continent, thanks to the generosity and industry of the White Government, now find that having killed the goose that laid the golden egg, that they have been reduced to a life of rape, robbery and cannibalism, in less than a generation.
The ruling class of this Bolshevik Communist, African National Congress Government, still hiding in the shadows, belongs to the very same White Race, which they have driven from power in South Africa, in a coup d’etat, a fact which they are desperate to deny and conceal, while they now target the remaining Whites of South Africa, as they have previously done in Russia, which will further reduce the ability of the Farmlands of South Africa to recover from the murderous assault of Black Racist rapists and killers, all of whom are being paid to carry out their dirty work, which will finally cripple South Africa, forcing these Black racists to take to the highway towards Europe, which is exactly what they are required to do.
On arrival, by ferry-boat, into Europe, these people whom have quite deliberately chosen to destroy their own country, will then be holding out their hands to beg the maximum from their new host in Europe, while those whom have already arrived are even now creating chaos in those European lands which are taking them in.
They are of course not welcome in the land which funded the destruction of South Africa, the people whom live there, whom have already stolen that land for themselves, are of a more hypocritical nature than is the average White Man, who is easy meat.
The same team of ‘experts’ which stole the Gold and Diamond mines in South Africa, which they were attempting to do, even as the Balfour Declaration was being composed, a possibility which was aided by Winston Churchill, who had spent time in South Africa fighting the Boers and who did then expose the Anzacs, whom were forced to fight against the Boers, to a brutal hail of gunfire at Gallipoli, in order to hold up the Ottoman Empire’s Army in its attempt to hold out against the coalition, which was determined to steal Palestine from them and that would be even as the coup d’etat, under the same control was ready to kick off in Russia, to steal that vast land from its rightful inhabitants.
So to even suggest that the Boers in South Africa, were the culprits of some alleged crime or another, against Black immigrants, whom were invited into South Africa by the British, as slave labour, which the British Deep State, is even now, promising to do all across Europe, is stretching the boundaries of belief to the very limit. The coup d’etat which followed on from the Russia takeover, was of course Germany, a few short years later. All of which would suggest an overall plan of some sort, so to blame some of the individual victims of this vast, diabolical, blood-thirsty plan, is absurd.
Donald Trump called the mainstream media the Fake News, so why, instead of investigating the MSN are there already steps afoot to claim that it is the Alternative Media, which is propagating the Fake News, which must be silenced?
On top of which, those whom have had no experience of how the News Media actually works, will be totally unaware of the Power of the Editor, which is evident even on Talk Radio, where the callers are totally controlled by the presenter, who calmly talks his way through a difficult question, without any real response and then thanks the caller for his ‘interesting’ question and immediately cuts him off. That is the ‘official’ version of Free Speech, which like Free Trade, only works in one direction, which is never in the direction favorable to the Man in the Street.
The BBC, which is funded by the British people, has a man called Cohen as editor of its News output, which allows him the final say in the content of what is presented to the British public. Sky News, which is owned by Rupert Murdoch a Jew, faithfully tows the line, defending the illegal destruction of Libya, Syria, Iraq, Yemen and Afghanistan, or indeed the demonisation of Donald Trump, using deliberately ‘edited’ clips of Trump’s speeches, to deceive the public.
Every aspect of our lives is now being edited in a similar fashion. While I am about to be denied the right to expose certain lies and disinformation, emanating from the depths of our controlled political system, unless I can get past Google editors, whom already prowl around YouTube, looking for anything of which they disapprove.
We now have school-teachers losing their jobs for failing to address a pupil, by what has now become, ‘their choice’ of pronoun, which denies the reality of their genetic make-up. For an intelligent school-teacher, to be obliged to conform to the wishes of a child, who has been convinced in recent times, to ‘believe’ at a very young age, that they are of the opposite sex, without any clear knowledge, as to how they have decided such a thing, is nothing more than the group ‘brain-washing of children at school.
This ridiculous situation has lead to females, whom believe themselves to be ‘really’ male, being prescribed Testosterone, by the family doctor, while effeminate men are being treated with Estrogen, when the exact opposite would be a more intelligent response.
The United Nations Charter, quite clearly states that we have the God-given right of ‘free speech’ despite which, ‘hate speech’ is now being given more official support, by those controlled politicians, as a means of last resort, to silence an opinion which involves a religious bias of some sort, by those whom would prefer us all to believe only what they tell us to believe and failure to so do, could cost you time in gaol.
A while back, in Benghazi, the centre of opposition to the Gadaffi regime, a few men in yellow plastic safety helmets, ran through the streets, indiscriminately shooting people. This appalling act of aggression, without any apparent need of clear evidence as to the identity of these killers, was used as justification to lay Libya to waste, killing a huge number of Libyans’ in the process.
The Prime Ministers of Britain and France, both stood before the people of Libya, after the murder of Gadaffi, and congratulated themselves, for having taken swift action, in response to the brutality of the Libyan Government. In sharp contrast, not too far away, the Government of Israel, has been shooting Palestinian Arabs, like fish in a barrel, even as new proposals are being forced through, in Western ‘Democracies’ proposing to make it a crime, to so much as criticise these blatant crimes against Muslims by the Jew State of Israel, never mind calling for the instant destruction of Israel, to ‘free the people’ from their despotic Rulers. What sort of Democratic government, would even consider introducing such a law? Well they would be the very same Democrats whom are coming out in support of Article 13
I have occasionally uploaded, to YouTube, snippets of music, from records or CD’s which I have actually bought. YouTube has noted all of these infringements of copyright, letting me know that action could be taken by the owner of the copyright. However, some of my original scribblings, in the main I write all of my own content, are frequently, presented by other sites, to their own readers, with a link to my posts or they retweet my Twitters, none of which is of any importance in itself, apart that is from the fact that a link to my site may soon entail my permission, however the MSN is about to be given total freedom from all this rubbish, giving them an exclusive control of the News, and any of my reports, about current events, which was included in an MSM article, could soon be called copyright, without any form of investigation into which of us was the first to report the event, much like several of the clips I have uploaded, which included MSN News reports, for which YouTube have tried to give me a ‘strike’.
We will very soon be denied the freedom to so much as suggest, that YouTube, Facebook, Google, all of the main Radio News outlets, TV News, the Newspaper Industry, publishing and Hollywood are all in the hands of Jews, a claim which though true, will soon be considered to be anti-Jew. The only genuinely open platform for an alternative point of view is the Internet, which is now, in the process of falling into the hands of those same Jew interests. Is this the new ‘Jew Only Free Speech?’
The European Union, which was instrumental in the destruction of European Industry, along with the ‘privatisation’ of all Utilities, and which has openly called for the immigration of millions of Africans into Europe, in a declared attempt to destroy the White Christian integrity of Europe, through the forceful imposition of Islamic regulations into Christian classrooms and the funding of Mosques in every European town and city, and the ‘selection’ of Muslims into positions of authority, is even now, without any reference to the electorate of European Member States, attempting to force through legislation, which will give them one more level of control over us all, through the total control of the Internet.
From where did the European Union receive the notion, that it was their job to censor the Internet, in order to benefit so-called copyright holders. That is surely the business of the holder of the copyright as has always been the case. So why are our ‘Leaders’ not standing up against this move, which will close down any criticism of the Dictatorial Rule of the European Union, allowing a group of unelected people more or less total control over what information we are allowed to access?
The complicity of the Worlds controlled media over the repetition of the lies used against Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and Syria is evidence enough of the need of the Alternative point of view and for these decisions to be once more shrouded behind a wall of propaganda, is scandalous.
As so often happens, I had already written all of the above, and I later chose the clip at the top, to support the survivors of the USS Liberty, whom have been all over the Alternative News in recent days, still looking not only for justice, but for a simple mention of the outrageous attack, which was carried out against them by Israel, in the MSM, so imagine my surprise when on watching the clip, Dr Pierce actually reiterated most of my spiel. Doggone it!
I adore the expression,’I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend, to the death, your right to say it.’ I was reminded of this frequently used piece of rubbish, most recently on a clip, which I posted, of George Galloway, on the BBC program, ‘Question Time,’ when Galloway was being shouted down, by an audience, which was composed of more Jews than was justifiable by their tiny percentage of the population of the UK.
This discussion was in response to the Charlie Hebdo incident in Paris, where ‘Free Speech’ demanded the ‘right’ of Jews to publish cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed, while forgetting to mention, as is usual, the ‘fact’ that Hebdo, had previously sacked a cartoonist who drew a cartoon of a Jew politician. Even in the above clip, the Jew Shapiro is ‘free’ to come up with yet another claim about Hitler, of which I had never heard.
George, bawled back at these Jews, something along the lines of, I have the right to express my opinion and you are not going to deny me my ‘freedom of speech’, all of it very commendable. Sadly, he then went on to express his sorrow, about the ‘Greatest Crime in History’ which was committed against the Jews and how, had he been old enough at the time, he would have been first in line to join the Army to go and save them. So that is your truth is it George?
Another Socialist and a good friend of Galloway’s, Ken Livingstone, a staunch defender of the right of ‘Freedom of Speech’, did a while back, find himself being pursued by a pack of Jews, for suggesting that Hitler had been in discussions with ‘Zionists’ – many Rabbis’ suggest, that Zionism, is nothing more than Judaism – about sending the German Jews to Madagascar or some other location..
There followed an absolute uproar, which made sure that, even those like me, whom had no idea that Livingstone had made such a ‘daft’ claim, were duly made fully aware of it. Which I suppose reduced the maximum possible number of World Jewry to tears of grief, by its International Broadcasting. Livingstone insisted that his claim was historically provable. He urged his persecutors to check it out for themselves.
Livingstone, having strongly defended his claim, which has never been denied historically, but which does not rest easy in the minds of Jews, then completely unravelled and went on to say, untruthfully, ‘That Hitler then went mad and decided to kill all the Jews,’ a claim, which we were all educated to believe, but which has never been backed up by any existing historical evidence, a claim which it is illegal to so much as question, just in case somebody might be offended, as I am when illegitimate claims are made against Hitler.
This is the ‘real’ level of ‘Free Speech’ in the United Kingdom, where even long serving politicians, are obliged to bend the knee to the power of ‘Zion’. Both Galloway and Livingstone should be ashamed of themselves. Particularly Galloway, who when confronted by a group of jeering Jews, in a program which was itself presented by a Jew, he did not have the courage to ‘go too far.’ He simply caved in. That makes me suspicious.
I have not had too much confidence in Galloway, particularly after his performance, while Libya was under attack, during which he gave his,’Champion of Muslims’ verdict that Gadaffi deserved all he got.
When the day comes, that the worried people of the Free West, have the right to discuss openly events like 911, which was surrounded by dozens of Jews, many of whom were arrested with bombs and bullets in their possession, driving a van with images of planes crashing into the WTC on the side, only to be released without charge, or indeed any ‘real’ discussion at all, about this other ‘Greatest Crime in the History of the Universe’ or the holocaust, both of which involve Jews and both of which have had a clamp-down imposed on them by controlled politicians. When these two, history changing events, have been given an open public airing, then there will be, at least an element of ‘free speech’ but until that day arrives there is no such thing as ‘Freedom of Speech’ or indeed even ‘Freedom of Thought.’
I had a good laugh this morning, while watching a publicity spot from CNN, Cable News Network, which has suffered greatly, from Donald Trump’s allegation that they presented Fake News, a claim which they are desperate to overcome.
On screen there was an apple. The voice-over informed me that some people may try to convince me that this apple is in fact a banana, but that CNN can assure me that it is indeed an apple, inferring that I can trust CNN to deliver the truth.
Should there be anyone reading this, who has ever been confronted by a merchant of Fakery, holding an apple in their hand telling them, with a straight face, that he was holding a banana, please put their hand up. This contrived example of humour posing as a form of honesty is as empty as is CNN’s Fake News.
A while back I decided to put the idea of the “freedom of speech and expression” to the test. Sadly, as with most popular misconceptions, it is a rare commodity. In my own sphere, I soon discovered that this “freedom” involves the full acceptance of all current stupidities, while to do otherwise leaves you open to derision.
My problems started, when during a coffee-time discussion about the French involvement in the destruction of Libya, an affable young lad suggested that these sort of problems could be better solved through the medium of love.
In all innocence I asked him to explain what he meant. The silence which fell over the group was palpable but in my new incarnation of upholder of the “Rights of Man” I pressed on.
I asked him if he felt uncomfortable with my question and if yes, was I now under an attack of love and if so, how was he doing it. I could sense that most of the other folk at the table were in support of the sentiments of this fable of love. They were part of a group of people who hold to the idea of love conquering all, while at the same time they can offer no convincing explanation as to why they are mostly divorced.
For some time after, most of the group, including the “love man” refused to speak to me, such is love. This all changed for a short period when a young girl had her bag and wallet stolen putting her into a bit of a hole. I made a spontaneous collection for her, to help her out, which, awkwardly, reinstated me into every bodies good books, but only for a short period.
My next transgression was on the day when there was a marriage in the Town Hall. I noticed that the guests, who were gathering outside, included a large number, whom though they looked like women, were in fact dressed like men.
I asked a fellow, whom I have known for years, if this was a Gay Wedding? He immediately called me a Fascist. I asked him what he meant. His response absolutely floored me. He suggested that I should not have even noticed that there was any difference between the Gay couple who were getting married and any heterosexual couple.
That was more than enough for me, as far as I was concerned that sort of stupidity qualified him as a verifiable cretin. I asked him how that made me a Fascist? He started to mumble something about Hitler’s hatred of homosexuals, so I asked him what a hatred of homosexuals had to do with being a Fascist?
I have noticed for some time that the actual meaning of Fascism has long been swamped out of existence and has been misrepresented as being a form of oppression, favoured, of course, by cruel Dictators.
I made a remark along the lines of, most of the crimes which have been laid at the door of Hitler, have never been proven. I asked him if he could point me towards a piece of evidence of Hitler’s attacks against homosexuals. Apparently, like love, it is all around us and like love it can ever be produced in support of claims which are continually made of it.
The fellow started to tell me that there was all the evidence of the Shoah, in support of what he was suggesting. When I pointed out that most of the evidence of the Shoah was so insecure, that in the end it could not have been the truth as all of the claims which were made in the past, have had to be revised. There is no need to revise the truth.
At which point, he warned me that if I continued in this manner, denying the Shoah, he would not be speaking to me again. When I put it to him that if I was obliged to believe something, was it not up to him to show me proof of the actuality of the event, in which I was meant to believe, otherwise it was no more than a religion and was he suggesting that I was not allowed to choose my own beliefs?
That was the end of the conversation and to this day, not one word has passed between us.
So where are we now? Love, Gay Marriage and the holocaust, that leaves us with that other hot potato, immigration.
Just a few days ago, yet another long time “friend” became agitated when I asked her opinion about the current level of immigration.
Her response was that there was no problem with immigration. When I asked her to explain to me the point at which it would become necessary to say that France was full, just like all of the other “really nice people” who can see no problem with the huge influx of immigrants into France, she was afraid to commit herself to any limit on immigration, when common sense suggests that there must be some limit, France cannot accept six or seven billion people.
At which point it becomes clear that most people fail to see the difference between economic immigrants and refugees or asylum seekers, intent on escaping the threat of torture or death in their homeland.
I asked her what was supposed to happen to the million or more young Muslim lads, living in the Banlieue de Paris whom had never been able to find a job. She had no answer. I asked her if she was happy about Paris being already more than fifty per-cent immigrant. She responded saying that all of the bigger cities in France were the same, but that was no problem.
When I suggested that immigrants were more likely than the French to have large families, she became aggressive with me, calling me racist and all the other insults, because the notion of immigrants having large families was a lie which was being put about by the Front Nationale.
When I suggested that most statistics showed that immigrants were having at least twice as many babies as were the French she was disgusted with the suggestion.
I told her that Irish people are renowned for their large families and that I have never heard of anybody suggesting that it was Racist or Fascist or anything else to suggest that this was the case, so why was there a problem to suggest that others might be the same?
I put it to her that she appeared to be saying that nobody had the right to question mass immigration and that when groups like Ukip in the UK or the Front Nationale in France stood up and said that enough is enough, they were going to be smeared and denigrated and anyone who agreed with them would be ostracised. At which point she said that if I continued along those lines she would not be speaking to me again.
The fact of the matter is that the United Kingdom and France should be prepared to accept whomsoever is trying to escape from Mali, Central Africa, Libya, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq, Syria, Sudan and wherever else, as they are responsible for the destruction of those countries and the creation of millions of refugees. So why should Europe decide that every country in Europe should take their share why not send them all to the UK and France?
Ireland has never invaded any country nor have the Irish people been responsible for world war-fare so why is Ireland under threat from a problem created by the British, French Americans and Israel?
It may have always been the same and it could be that in the past I have simply not noticed, but there are dozens of references made to the crimes of Hitler on a daily basis. Just yesterday I was confronted with my latest “free speech” issue. I was not even involved in the conversation which provoked it, I just happened to be standing near-by.
A fellow was babbling about the atrocities of Hitler and the Germans and I quietly asked him why it was that folk were forever attacking Hitler and yet they never said a word about Stalin, whom had slaughtered 65 million Christians. The man stiffened and I could see that he was going to have no sympathy for my remark.
For once I managed to keep my mouth shut, mainly because the man was a good sort and it was clear that he had a limited understanding of what had happened during the war.
So shamefully, it becomes clear that when the Jew François Hollande, is suggesting that to criticise Jews should be illegal, nobody is going to give a damn, any more than they will when the Jew Cameron makes Conspiracy Investigation illegal.
So what sort of Free Speech are we left with? What sort of Freedom and Human Rights are the immigrants in Ireland demanding? Are there Human Rights for Immigrants which are denied to the rest of us? Why are our governments, behind our backs, bringing in large numbers of immigrants in the first place.
My last point, I asked the woman who was in favour of Immigration, what she thought about the genocide against Whites in South Africa? Like many others, she felt that they had brought on themselves through their past actions.
When I suggested to her that the Boers had in fact been in South Africa before the Blacks, which had been a large empty space when they arrived three hundred or so years ago and that the Black were immigrants, looking for work.
She scoffed saying that it was ridiculous to suggest that Whites had been there before the Blacks. I refuted that claim, saying that Africa was a huge continent and most of the people were hunter gatherers of one form or another. leaving the vast prairies free for farming, for which the Boers used it.
I asked her if she felt that it was OK to call Africa a Black Mans Continent and if so what was Europe? Plus how she felt about the brutal attacks against BLACK asylum seekers in South Africa by the Rainbow People.
Did she agree with Israel expelling the Black Jew “infiltrators” into Israel and the lack of immigration into States which were not of European origin?
Nobody can answer these sort of questions because to do so would display the crass stupidity of their stance. So I think that in reality there is no such animal as true Freedom of Speech and when you have numb-heads telling me that it is racist to be able to distinguish Black from White and Male from Female it becomes clear that when even relatively intelligent people fail to understand how it should apply to the beliefs of others, things will get no better.