Sometimes I get so puzzled by events which take place in various places across the world, that I begin to doubt the stuff which I write in response. Israel, we are assured has Nuclear Weapons, the plans for which were stolen by Israeli agents, and according to Major Jordan’s Diaries, tons of secret stuff, was flown off by the crate load to Israel and while everybody knows about this, nobody seems to have cared too much.
Israel attacked the USS Liberty, in order to fabricate an excuse for America to attack Egypt, which was to be blamed for the attack on the Liberty. LBJ the man who killed Kennedy, wanted the Liberty to be sunk and all of the crew killed, to keep their mouths shut. He need not have bothered because many crew members did survive and indeed told their tale and nobody cared
We all know that Israel planted the explosives in the World Trade Centre, while the CIA wired Building 7, with the Bush Family taking care of security. Everybody knows that the Trade Centre was virtually empty, there is evidence that it had never been fully occupied, so the death toll was probably falsified.
We all know that the attacks on Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya and later Syria were to destroy the fossil water reserves in Libya, to put a stop to Gadaffi’s aim of mounting an African grouping, to make sure that the theft of Africa’s resources could be brought to an end. This aspect of the atrocity was never mentioned. Afghanistan was massacred to allow the Forces of Infamy, to reinstate and increase the ‘Poppy’ production for ‘Big Pharma’, Iraq was destroyed for British Petroleum and “The Dollar” and Syria, for what else but “Jew Destiny”
Hanging over all of this crap, is the threat of Nuclear War, because Iran is more to be feared than the most belligerent States on the Planet, Britain, France, America and Israel, all of whom have Nuclear Weapons and one and all, it has been decided, have a safe pair of hands, while Iran is a Rogue State.
All of the above and much more is common knowledge. We all know that Hitler was a Patsy. that the biggest loss of life during the unnecessary war, which was manufactured by the British, Americans, French and let us not forget, the Russians, were the Germans. The current group of War Mongers has the same composition as the group which declared war on Germany, not because Hitler was mistreating anyone at all, but to create a situation which would allow the taking of Palestine, and after that, the entire region, however many lives would be lost in the process.
All of the evidence of this is plain to see. General George Patton, in his personal scribblings mentioned the enormous numbers of Jews whom were streaming into Germany – which they now control – after the war was over he complained about their stench, and admitted that he “Nearly lost his lunch”, when he entered a building in which the Jews were eating and defecating simultaneously. He heard not a word about the sad fact that virtually every Jew in Europe, was dead.
At the time there were no more than six million Jews, in the regions touched by the war and six million had died as a result of an alleged German atrocity. Another six million claimed reparations as survivors, from the Germans after the war.
This was most surely the finest example of the truth of a “Zombie Resurrection” in history, in fact they brought back enough of the dead, to enable the Jew Almanac to record a five-hundred-thousand increase in the world’s population of Jews, after the war. These things were all recorded, I am simply mentioning what has long been understood but ignored as of being of no particular importance.
The Jews of this world have been just as bamboozled by the stuff that ‘baffles brains’ as have the Goy, when Armageddon arrives, they will quickly discover, that they have been carefully rounded up and staked out waiting, with the Mark of Cain on their forehead, for the artificial, sacrificial edifice of Israel, to come tumbling down on their heads, they have served their purpose and they are now expendable.
The Goy have been duped by a number of gallant heroes, like Kennedy, Gorbachev, Putin and Trump, whom came riding in from the hills, to save them, while the Big Plan continued regardless. Nothing has changed, we have simply been manipulated into believing that by electing an outsider into the inside, that they will be able to bring down the murdering scabrous band, by whom we have been controlled for the past Century. If only it was that simple.
I believe that those like me, are being labelled as part of the “Alternative Media” which is an attempt to homogenise the opposition, into a single group which can be controlled through the means of claims of us being vendors of ‘Fake News’.
The ‘Alternative’ is itself making this process possible, through the means of linking us together, as if we are a united front of some sort, while in truth, I have doubts about what is actually being presented by many of those within this ‘Alternative’ grouping. Many sites contain a list of links to other similar sites, which is fine, I am on some of them, however there seems to be an attempt to align me and others like me, with those, ‘Big Alternative Boys’ whom are attempting to construct a money-making alternative to the money-making professional media.
The best known of this type of set-up is the Infowar’s Empire of Alex Jones. In past times, I was a regular listener to the Podcast of Jones, which I downloaded on the wifi at McDonalds and listened to at home, during the time when I had no internet connection. Whatever Jones has become, he was extremely useful to those like me, who had no contact with any other source of information, after his 911 reports, had alerted those with ears to hear, that all of the claims made on that day, did not add up. However, Alex Jones, who now supports Donald Trump, is being attacked by those sites like, Jeff Rense, who never misses an opportunity to insult Jones or Trump.
Rense is the man who fell asleep at the wheel and then claimed that it was in fact an attack, by un-named Security Forces, using a futuristic “sound weapon” which rendered him unconscious. Rense, like Jones and many others on the alternative side of things, relies on ads for alternative medicinal potions, which he claims to use every day of his life, to protect him from the radio-activity from the destroyed Fukushima Nuclear Plant.
Along with Republic Broadcasting Network, these are the three main sources of hidden information which is available to those seeking the truth. Over the years, many others have vanished, as did my own particular favourite Oracle Broadcasting. This has lead to a situation, in which three sources have taken a form of control of the broadcasted alternative view.
While all this is going on, the subject which interests me the most and which would most assuredly help to destroy the false narrative, with which we have been force fed for years, about the Moon Landings, the Holocaust, the real controllers of Slavery, Immigration of Blacks coming into White lands the Flat Earth, the banking system and many other diversions, is the Nuclear Threat, which is now being used to generate a fight against Iran and North Korea, but not against Israel, India or Pakistan.
We are told, by those like Eustace Mullins, who has influenced my ideas more than have many others, that the Atom Bomb was intended to finish off Germany, but that the greedy Jews, whom were working on the bomb, were so intent on sucking as many Dollars out of the purse of the American Tax Payers as possible, that they were surprised by the end of the War in Europe and therefore were obliged to test out their creation on Japan.
I now believe that Mullins was wrong, I am in fact more inclined to believe that there is no such thing as an Atomic Bomb, it is merely a contrived excuse to keep us in fear. I might add, I also have certain doubts about the position of Iran in this nonsense. As far as I can discover, neither India or Pakistan, have ever been inspected to assure conformity with International Atomic Energy Agency regulations, why not?
“The country tested its first nuclear device in May 1974, and remains outside both the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) and the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty (CTBT). However, India has a facility-specific safeguards agreement in place with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and a waiver from the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) allowing it to participate in global civilian nuclear technology commerce. India has a sizeable and growing nuclear arsenal, primarily because of decades of conflict with neighbouring Pakistan, which also possesses nuclear weapons.” NTI.org.
America and the British have been carrying out bombing raids in Pakistan for years, without any apparent fear of an Atomic reprisal, how can that be, when both Pakistan and India have been in a constant state of alert against one another since 1948? Israel has the Samson Option, which they threaten to use against the whole world, should any action be taken against Israel by the Forces of the West, by unleashing their Atomic Weapons, against all and everybody, which should most surely call into question the sanity of the Israeli Government, a threat which ought to at least worry the West, just a little bit, but which appears to be of no concern whatsoever. So what is this alleged threat all about?
Why no outcry about the above from Western Politicians? This is blatant hypocrisy and it is quite possible to believe that the entire Western Media deliberately ignores this sort of guff from Israel. It would appear that Israel can do and say whatever they like without criticism. As a citizen of the West, I would like to know why we support this sort of Apartheid and thuggery, never mind the Samson Option, which is promising to kill us all. What are we being fooled and lied to about?
It is impossible for me to claim that the threat of a Nuclear disaster is a total lie which was and is being used to keep us living in fear, however it is remarkable how our leaders never question anything. There has been no light shone of the Holocaust or indeed the Bolshevik Atrocities in the Soviet Union, which were far more sinister than anything which happened to the Jews, but then the victims were only Christians.
The Gulag ‘Concentration Death Camps” were of course under the command of mainly Jews, both before and after the War. The Cheka, the original name of the KGB was also a Jew operation, which remains a closely guarded secret. There are many other things which we are unable to investigate, including the Holocaust in Ireland, which was ordered by the City of London, which even, kowtowing Irish politicians, still claim was only a matter of the failure of the potato crop, while choosing to ignore the exportation of millions of tons of Irish produce, stolen at gunpoint and exported to England. Since the days of the First Elizabeth to the reign of the Second Elizabeth the Jews have controlled affairs in Ireland.
It is hard to believe that I am mistaken in all of the above. It simply cannot all be imaginary nonsense, so why, along with the current blatant War Crimes and atrocities in Palestine, which in anybodies terms, in the modern, civilised world, are unspeakable and disgusting, crimes which have been ongoing from long before we had been even introduced to the claims of the Holocaust, not being openly discussed in the British Parliament, which is the source of all of the problems in the Middle East?
One of these days I will look into Russia and Putin’s part in the Space Station Hoax, that should be good one, even as we are approaching, the affirmative action choice of more Black people as astronauts, which should be quite funny watching them doing the obligatory weightless somersault, with fingers crossed, that it will not be their turn to fall on their head nearly breaking their neck, in the manner of the mouthy British acrobat Tim Peake.
A while back I decided to put the idea of the “freedom of speech and expression” to the test. Sadly, as with most popular misconceptions, it is a rare commodity. In my own sphere, I soon discovered that this “freedom” involves the full acceptance of all current stupidities, while to do otherwise leaves you open to derision.
My problems started, when during a coffee-time discussion about the French involvement in the destruction of Libya, an affable young lad suggested that these sort of problems could be better solved through the medium of love.
In all innocence I asked him to explain what he meant. The silence which fell over the group was palpable but in my new incarnation of upholder of the “Rights of Man” I pressed on.
I asked him if he felt uncomfortable with my question and if yes, was I now under an attack of love and if so, how was he doing it. I could sense that most of the other folk at the table were in support of the sentiments of this fable of love. They were part of a group of people who hold to the idea of love conquering all, while at the same time they can offer no convincing explanation as to why they are mostly divorced.
For some time after, most of the group, including the “love man” refused to speak to me, such is love. This all changed for a short period when a young girl had her bag and wallet stolen putting her into a bit of a hole. I made a spontaneous collection for her, to help her out, which, awkwardly, reinstated me into every bodies good books, but only for a short period.
My next transgression was on the day when there was a marriage in the Town Hall. I noticed that the guests, who were gathering outside, included a large number, whom though they looked like women, were in fact dressed like men.
I asked a fellow, whom I have known for years, if this was a Gay Wedding? He immediately called me a Fascist. I asked him what he meant. His response absolutely floored me. He suggested that I should not have even noticed that there was any difference between the Gay couple who were getting married and any heterosexual couple.
That was more than enough for me, as far as I was concerned that sort of stupidity qualified him as a verifiable cretin. I asked him how that made me a Fascist? He started to mumble something about Hitler’s hatred of homosexuals, so I asked him what a hatred of homosexuals had to do with being a Fascist?
I have noticed for some time that the actual meaning of Fascism has long been swamped out of existence and has been misrepresented as being a form of oppression, favoured, of course, by cruel Dictators.
I made a remark along the lines of, most of the crimes which have been laid at the door of Hitler, have never been proven. I asked him if he could point me towards a piece of evidence of Hitler’s attacks against homosexuals. Apparently, like love, it is all around us and like love it can ever be produced in support of claims which are continually made of it.
The fellow started to tell me that there was all the evidence of the Shoah, in support of what he was suggesting. When I pointed out that most of the evidence of the Shoah was so insecure, that in the end it could not have been the truth as all of the claims which were made in the past, have had to be revised. There is no need to revise the truth.
At which point, he warned me that if I continued in this manner, denying the Shoah, he would not be speaking to me again. When I put it to him that if I was obliged to believe something, was it not up to him to show me proof of the actuality of the event, in which I was meant to believe, otherwise it was no more than a religion and was he suggesting that I was not allowed to choose my own beliefs?
That was the end of the conversation and to this day, not one word has passed between us.
So where are we now? Love, Gay Marriage and the holocaust, that leaves us with that other hot potato, immigration.
Just a few days ago, yet another long time “friend” became agitated when I asked her opinion about the current level of immigration.
Her response was that there was no problem with immigration. When I asked her to explain to me the point at which it would become necessary to say that France was full, just like all of the other “really nice people” who can see no problem with the huge influx of immigrants into France, she was afraid to commit herself to any limit on immigration, when common sense suggests that there must be some limit, France cannot accept six or seven billion people.
At which point it becomes clear that most people fail to see the difference between economic immigrants and refugees or asylum seekers, intent on escaping the threat of torture or death in their homeland.
I asked her what was supposed to happen to the million or more young Muslim lads, living in the Banlieue de Paris whom had never been able to find a job. She had no answer. I asked her if she was happy about Paris being already more than fifty per-cent immigrant. She responded saying that all of the bigger cities in France were the same, but that was no problem.
When I suggested that immigrants were more likely than the French to have large families, she became aggressive with me, calling me racist and all the other insults, because the notion of immigrants having large families was a lie which was being put about by the Front Nationale.
When I suggested that most statistics showed that immigrants were having at least twice as many babies as were the French she was disgusted with the suggestion.
I told her that Irish people are renowned for their large families and that I have never heard of anybody suggesting that it was Racist or Fascist or anything else to suggest that this was the case, so why was there a problem to suggest that others might be the same?
I put it to her that she appeared to be saying that nobody had the right to question mass immigration and that when groups like Ukip in the UK or the Front Nationale in France stood up and said that enough is enough, they were going to be smeared and denigrated and anyone who agreed with them would be ostracised. At which point she said that if I continued along those lines she would not be speaking to me again.
The fact of the matter is that the United Kingdom and France should be prepared to accept whomsoever is trying to escape from Mali, Central Africa, Libya, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq, Syria, Sudan and wherever else, as they are responsible for the destruction of those countries and the creation of millions of refugees. So why should Europe decide that every country in Europe should take their share why not send them all to the UK and France?
Ireland has never invaded any country nor have the Irish people been responsible for world war-fare so why is Ireland under threat from a problem created by the British, French Americans and Israel?
It may have always been the same and it could be that in the past I have simply not noticed, but there are dozens of references made to the crimes of Hitler on a daily basis. Just yesterday I was confronted with my latest “free speech” issue. I was not even involved in the conversation which provoked it, I just happened to be standing near-by.
A fellow was babbling about the atrocities of Hitler and the Germans and I quietly asked him why it was that folk were forever attacking Hitler and yet they never said a word about Stalin, whom had slaughtered 65 million Christians. The man stiffened and I could see that he was going to have no sympathy for my remark.
For once I managed to keep my mouth shut, mainly because the man was a good sort and it was clear that he had a limited understanding of what had happened during the war.
So shamefully, it becomes clear that when the Jew François Hollande, is suggesting that to criticise Jews should be illegal, nobody is going to give a damn, any more than they will when the Jew Cameron makes Conspiracy Investigation illegal.
So what sort of Free Speech are we left with? What sort of Freedom and Human Rights are the immigrants in Ireland demanding? Are there Human Rights for Immigrants which are denied to the rest of us? Why are our governments, behind our backs, bringing in large numbers of immigrants in the first place.
My last point, I asked the woman who was in favour of Immigration, what she thought about the genocide against Whites in South Africa? Like many others, she felt that they had brought on themselves through their past actions.
When I suggested to her that the Boers had in fact been in South Africa before the Blacks, which had been a large empty space when they arrived three hundred or so years ago and that the Black were immigrants, looking for work.
She scoffed saying that it was ridiculous to suggest that Whites had been there before the Blacks. I refuted that claim, saying that Africa was a huge continent and most of the people were hunter gatherers of one form or another. leaving the vast prairies free for farming, for which the Boers used it.
I asked her if she felt that it was OK to call Africa a Black Mans Continent and if so what was Europe? Plus how she felt about the brutal attacks against BLACK asylum seekers in South Africa by the Rainbow People.
Did she agree with Israel expelling the Black Jew “infiltrators” into Israel and the lack of immigration into States which were not of European origin?
Nobody can answer these sort of questions because to do so would display the crass stupidity of their stance. So I think that in reality there is no such animal as true Freedom of Speech and when you have numb-heads telling me that it is racist to be able to distinguish Black from White and Male from Female it becomes clear that when even relatively intelligent people fail to understand how it should apply to the beliefs of others, things will get no better.