So if Jimmy Savile is the United Kingdoms most prolific dead pervert, whom is the most prolific living monster?
It should be remembered that the allegations against Savile are no more serious than are those against members of the Establishment, whom have been named by abused children, which are still being ignored by the Police, as were those whom complained about Savile when he was still alive.
There is a serious attempt being made to downplay events at Kincora, North Wales and Haut de la Garenne on the isle of Jersey and the Dunblane Massacre, where members of the elite were quite clearly involved.
Why has this investigation been allowed to become circumscribed, to the extent that we can now believe the complaints of those whom speak of Savile, while the police continue to ignore the complaints of those like Steve Messham, whom complained about some member of the McAlpine family, whom was apparently named by the police themselves.
Where are the police files which contain the names of member’s of the Government itself? What has been done to investigate allegations that Gordon Brown is a paedophile? Could it be true that an old friend of Tony Blair, procured children for high-ranking officials in the European Parliament? What of the allegations which have been made against the very Police Service which has the responsibility of carrying out the investigation. It should be remembered that the Police Family Liaison Officers, whom comforted the bereaved families, after the Soham murders, were themselves paedophiles.
When Tom Watson MP, made the remark, in the UK Parliament, that a certain member of a past Prime Minister’s Cabinet, had been implicated in the abuse of children, he was being generous, the reality being that many past Cabinet members and indeed past Prime Ministers have been implicated in the foul practice. It appears to go even farther up the ladder.
What we are up against is a limited action being taken against a small fry, at the BBC while the real offenders from the Police Service, Judiciary, Government and Royalty, are considered “Too Big To Fail.”
It should be borne in mind that Spooks from MI5, and the Police, have in their possession, damning evidence against probably every politician in Parliament and every High Court Judge on the circuit. There will be no mass exposure of the guilty. No horrifying evidence of the behaviour of past Prime Ministers, such as Edward Heath, whom was implicated in both the Haut de la Garenne and Kincora, child abuse scandals. The living abusers, whom are still holding well paid jobs, can rest assured that they, like Savile, will only be named, long after their deaths.
The Judge, whom conducted the inquiry into the Dunblane Massacre, claimed that he had been put under pressure to deliver a verdict that would protect the identity and guilt of members of an elite and secret Masonic Lodge, the Speculative Society. That such a decision could be forced on to a judge, indicates the true state of justice in the UK and the forlorn hope of the revelation of the names of the perverts, whom were guaranteed their anonymity, in return for their future obedience. That, sadly, is how the system works.
As the net closes in around them, politicians are starting to manufacture an atmosphere of injustice, in order to turn the heat on to the messenger, giving them time to organise an inter-party resistance to what could be and should be disastrous for numerous, predatory paedophiles in central and local government.
I do not believe that there is a single Member in the Commons, whom does not know whether Gordon Brown is, as alleged, a paedophile. The same thing applies to his colleague, Peter Mandelson, whom a whistle-blower, has already alleged to be a procurer of children for members of the European Commission.
William Hague, the man whom went to such extraordinary lengths to deny his own homosexuality, that it became embarrassing just listening to him, explaining his wife’s miscarriage as proof that he had in fact had sex with her, so how could he be a homosexual? After he had been caught spending the night with his chauffeur. Hague was the man whom ordered that the names of the men, whom were accused of abuse, in the North Wales abuse scandal, by the victims, should not be published. As they have not been during the years since, and none were prosecuted. As is usual in these cases, only the gaolers were gaoled. Hague was a friend of Jimmy Savile, whom was implicated in the North Wales Affair and no doubt of the McAlpine family.
An unknown number of orphans have vanished, from so-called Care Homes, others have told tales of humiliation and torture and gang rape. In Dunblane, sixteen boys and a teacher were gunned down in cold blood. By chance, they were the boys whom had complained of having been rented out to Masonic Lodges for sexual abuse. Several leading politicians not only had connections to the alleged killer, but also to the Masonic Lodge implicated in the abuse. In light of this case, Tony Blair was obliged to demand a one hundred year D Notice to be slapped onto the Enquiry Report, in order to avert the arrest of half of his War Cabinet, as the illegal war on Iraq approached.
In Kincora in Northern Ireland, Royalty and their Politicians, such as Ted Heath, a paedophile of repute, and the British Security Services, are all alleged to have made use of the boys in the Care Home, for various purposes, including the filming of abuse, which was used to blackmail the abuser. Once again the Toff’s were implicated, the boys were taken to be abused at Birr Castle in Eire, which was owned by the folk whom in earlier times, played out sado-masochistic games to pander to the obscene desires of the Nobility, in the Hellfire Club. Human remains were uncovered in the cellar of the Club.
There were also overtones of Black Magic Rites, which involved the savage Shankhill Butchers, whom had apparently drained the blood from the body of their last victim and accidentally left him alive to relate the tale. Once again only the gaolers were gaoled.
In the Haut de la Garenne case in Jersey, we have both Jimmy Savile and Ted Heath, on the scene of the crime. Once again we have human remains being dug up all over the site of the Care Home and a hastily hidden dungeon. Prince Charles was a friend of a director of the Haut de la Garenne, as he was of Jimmy Savile and of course he no doubt had rather a lot of contact with Ted Heath.
This is just a brief oversight of some of the antics of those whom rule us. Can this all be dismissed as malicious gossip? What are the heir to the throne and his brother doing in the company of paedophiles? How many Toffs were implicated in Operation Ore? How many police officers and Judges were found with downloaded images of children being abused?
This should not be turned into an issue which the guilty can wriggle out of by claiming it is all just ridiculous allegations. If the names of the abusers are in the hands of the police in readiness for a trial, where is the trial?
It was not the Dunblane killer whom was implicated in the Speculative Society child abuse, it was a group of politicians, why have their names been kept secret? In Kincora it was not the staff of the Care Home, whom had access to Birr Castle, it was Royalty and Politicians. Why do we not know their identity?
How many serial paedophiles, whom should be on the Sex Abusers Register, are walking amongst vulnerable children, whom should they be abused, will be ignored by the police, when they present their evidence?
The sacking of BBC staff should not be used in “There you are, we’ve taken care of the problem,” effort, as a means of burying the issue. We have already waited decades for other trials, which have never materialised, after, long delayed Enquiries have been used to smother the evidence and the guilty. I get the uncomfortable feeling that the folk whom run the Enquiries, could well be a part of the problem themselves. High Society is riddled with this filth, the people must insist on openness this time.
Now we know that all it took for my brother Lord (Alistair) McAlpine to be exonerated as a paedophile was for the victim Steven Messham to be shown a photograph of his alleged abuser. (These are the words of Sir William McAlpine, the brother of the cousin of the man, whom it is now being suggested, was the real paedophile, whose photograph was shown to Steve Messham by the police during an investigation of child abuse.)
A friend of mine once told me how all it took to avoid being charged with a speeding offence, was a neatly folded ten pound note inside his driving licence.
Sir William made no reference whatsoever to the sexual orientation of his nephew, Jimmie McAlpine, or offered any better reason for the alleged mistake by Meesham, whom may well have forgotten the first name of his abuser, but he did in fact get the right family name, which in itself is odd, than that it was no more than a case of mistaken identity.
Jimmie McAlpine, is now dead, so it matters little should the family choose to besmirch his memory, by suggesting that he was the guilty abuser. Or is it being suggested by Sir William, that he could have told the police, had they bothered to ask, that no member of his family, would take part in such loathsome behaviour. McAlpine Inc. was at the time busily desecrating North Wales, quarrying for Slate. So apparently we no longer need Court Trials, the word of a rich Toff should suffice.
Once again the BBC is in the dock. My mind goes back to the disgraceful sacking of Greg Dyke and Andrew Gilligan, for in effect, telling the truth about the Blair Government, which is of course taboo on the BBC. After the furore had calmed down, they were both vindicated by subsequent events.
I listened to John Humphrys driving into Entwistle, the recently resigned DG, demanding whether he ever read the papers or listened to the News? I found this quite amusing coming from Humphrys, whom has never asked such a question of any politician in Government in all of his years at the Beeb. I have memories of his interview of Jonathan Sacks, the Chief Rabbi, when he was quite obviously warned to leave off Gaza. The Rabbi himself was unctuous to the point of embarrassment.
However the same question could well be asked of Sir William McAlpine, concerning his nephew, whom he employed in the Wrexham locale, is he saying he had not seen or heard any reference to the exploits of Jimmie, which were well-known to the local police? Which would account for the photo which it is now being claimed, was the actual photo, which was shown to Messham at the time and later destroyed. Did he have no curiosity whatsoever about how this mistake could have occurred? Or indeed if it was not Jimmie, who the hell was it?
When the original disclosure, concerning the behaviour of Jimmy Savile started to surface, everything was fine, the airwaves were full of it, Savile was, after all, nothing more than an awkward, inarticulate buffoon, whom had been given plum jobs which he did not merit, to the bafflement of most intelligent viewers.
The BBC, maybe unknowingly, did the right thing for the “Establishment,” when they chose to ignore it or stifle it, take your pick. However one of the commercial TV channels got a hold of it, which led on to the Blogosphere, where the real journalists lurk and hey presto! the seething filth of the Establishment was laid bare.
Thanks to little snitches like Humphrys, the people are never told the truth. For example, where was Humphrys during the Kincora Scandal, did he attempt to dig out the British paedophiles involved in that one? Where are the disclosures of the antics of Lord Mountbatten. Where is the truth of Churchill, whom was adored by the BBC and of course, the “Grocer,” Ted Heath.
Entwistle is, like Greg Dyke before him, the sacrificial lamb, being slaughtered to calm down the whole affair and put it back in the box and not on the box. The object of all this Cinema, is to make sure that nothing else concerning High Society paedophilia will be broached on the BBC. Why else would the BBC become the story, as they say, while the victims are once again being sacrificed to save the criminals.
Will the likes of Humphrys be pushing for an enquiry into the destruction of relevant evidence, which was part of the Messham accusation in the first pace. How can a satisfactory decision be made about the McAlpine role in the affair without the necessary evidence? Should not the BBC be setting up an investigative team to look into the destruction of relevant evidence, particularly as it comes hot on the heels of the Hillsborough Scandal?
We are dealing with extremely rich and powerful people, whom are well used to double-dealing in their business affairs and “Lobbying,” which is code for bribing is all part of the game. Many victims have been paid off down through the years, allowing the guilty to avoid the law. Unfortunately many of the guilty are members of the Law and Judiciary themselves.
It would appear on the surface that Entwistle was ambushed. Perhaps there is something else behind this whole load of rubbish. The BBC did not name Lord McAlpine, it is true that there are many references to him online but it is unfair to suggest that the “Newsnight” suggestion that those interested could find references there, was in some way responsible for those references being there. I would suggest that those references would have surfaced anyway.
After the sacking of Dyke, a Jew Michael Grade was put in charge, during his first Press Conference, The Jerusalem Post asked Grade whether he would be removing Orla Guerin from her post in Gaza. He said he would not, Guerin however was soon sent to Rhodesia.
The next choice, Mark Thompson, was married to a Jew, which gives him Jewish children, Thompson was a frequent visitor to Israel, he is now in line for a job with the Jewish controlled media in the US. It will be interesting to see whom will replace Entwistle.