“It’s not a march about Trump the man,” Terry O’Neill, the president of the National Organization for Women, said in an interview. “It’s a march about women’s rights that are very much imperiled by the policies President-elect Trump appears headed for.”
I was pleasantly surprised to find that the National Organisation for Women, had at least displayed a modicum of intelligence, by electing a male, possibly Irish President.
But I was suddenly struck by the thought that it may be a ‘Transgender,’ or perhaps the male component in a homosexual marriage. Or maybe simply a sign that as there are no fixed genders anymore, even the Feminists felt obliged to recognise the aims of equality, by allowing the entry of mere ‘confused’ men into an illegal organisation, which is totally biased towards one sex.
Of course it could all be symptomatic of women whom have always been secretly jealous of the obvious superiority of men, dropping the I, in Terri for the more sturdy spelling of the male Terry.
Just a glance at the above list of projects, in which these women and cross gender folk are involved, discloses very little in terms fairness, because any man will tell you that a comparison between the work undertaken by men and that of women is impossible, as women are not expected to go after the ‘mens work,’ that is always totally avoided, so any comparison is made only with jobs which are strictly of the more gentile easier variety, where women are now hired not on the basis of capability but because of quotas. They now complain about the cost of Child Minders, where other women take care of their children.
So-called Racial Justice falls into the same bracket. We are now obliged, because we are White, to make way for other ethnicities in our workforce, an idea which has apparently gained no traction at all in China or Uganda or indeed anywhere else on earth.
As for Constitutional Equality, that they already profit from, what they now want is a special reference to women, as if they are not part of We The People.
LGBTQ Rights are a mystery to me, I assume the Q is not a reference to queers and I can think of nothing else off the top of my head, apart that is from the fact that as long as these folk are treated according to the law, which applies to us all, I can find no good reason as to why a man with a propensity to stick his dick in another man’s bum should be entitled to ‘special’ considerations, just get on with it.
Now we get to the heart of ‘Feminism’ where we hear calls to legally, murder male White babies and other menaces against men. The call for Reproductive Rights and Justice, demands access to Legal Abortion and Emergency Contraception. What is Emergency Contraception? Is it a spacial ‘hot-line telephone number which a woman can call, before having un-protected sex, from where a box of Johnnies will be delivered, perhaps by a man on a motorbike, or could it be something more sinister?
Ending violence against women, is a strange idea, violence from where or who or whom? Would that call for non-violence apply to showing mercy for female babies? No more smacking your daughters, reserving your vicious side for your boys? As is the way with ‘Feminists, they can specifically demand Rights which apply only to them, they are never in favour of Human Rights.
Women will never admit to being even more violent in the home than are men. Winnie Mandela, the wife of Saint Nelson, urged the use of burning tyre, necklaces around the necks of those whom had offended her, while Saint Nelson was busily singing songs calling for the genocide of the White Man.
When will we see a Womens’ March in support of the White Women whom are being slaughtered, out of hand, by Black savages in South Africa. That is a confusing idea, due to the support which is being given in the name of Black Lives, which do not appear to matter to other Blacks, whom kill each other in large numbers, but which ‘must’ matter to the Police, whom apparently have never ever shot a guilty Black man, they are all innocent, pretty much out of the mould of the Feminists.