When David Cameron, the self-proclaimed ‘proud’ Jew, who alongside the Jew Nicolas Sarkozy, used the excuse of a “No Fly Zone” to completely destroy Libya, having already strategically placed covert British Forces, on the ground in Libya, whom under cover of the bombing campaign captured tortured and murdered Muammar Gadaffi and members of his family, Cameron, in order to carry out this War Crime, needed the support of the British Parliament, support which was duly forthcoming.
Despite the resulting criticism of this raid on Libya and the devastation which resulted, including the murder of an American Ambassador, who having been denied military assistance from American Forces in Libya, by Hillary Clinton, was brutally tortured and killed by the “Rebel Forces” in Libya, an act which it has been alleged was allowed by Clinton, who was in the process of shipping a massive cache of arms, from Libya, to the “Rebel Forces” in Syria, an act of which the Ambassador was opposed.
When the benign attention of the British was some time later focussed on Syria, where yet another war to “corner control of the resources” had been initiated under cover of a pack of lies, by the British and French, the cold-blooded slaughter and destruction of Syria, was stalled, by the intervention of Iran, Hezbollah and Russia and Cameron was once more faced with the challenge of a Parliamentary vote in favour of, wait for it, the bombing of the very “Rebel Forces” whom had already been used to destroy Libya, “Rebels” whom had been allowed by the British to steal, and transport, oil from Syrian oil wells, to Turkey, using hundreds of road tankers supplied by the United States, oil which the “Rebels” sold to Israel, to “fund their operations in Syria”.
Having been “unable” to spot these huge convoys of tankers, on the open desert road to Turkey, which were quickly spotted and destroyed by the Russians, Cameron now cynically sought permission from the British Parliament to bomb the Daech Rebels, in Syria, permission which was duly granted by a large majority of all Parties in the House of Commons.
Cameron was of course, yet again lying through his teeth, the attacks in Syria were made, as had been the attacks in Libya, uniquely against the superstructure of Syria. Cameron has been intent on laying the entire region to waste, while back in the UK he was promoting the immigration of as many fleeing refugees, from the Middle East as could be persuaded to leave their homelands.
In view of all of the above deception, what, in the opinion of those whom celebrate the Centenary of the right of women to be elected to Parliament in the United Kingdom, has been achieved in terms of changing the belligerent attitude of the British establishment? Theresa May, the current Prime Minister, voted in favour of all of the recent British War Crimes all the way back to the destruction of Iraq, to the most recent use of British weapons to destroy Yemen, as did many other “caring” females in the House of Commons, despite the massive evidence that it was all based on rubbish and lies.
Theresa May has recently been conducting a campaign of hate, which was initiated by the Queen of Benghazi, Hillary Clinton – during her sleazy campaign against Donald Trump – against the “enemy” Russia, which dared to put a stop to the total destruction of Syria. In fact under her leadership, the British people have been deluged with outright lies about events in the Middle East, where unsupported claims of the use of Chemical Weapons have been laid against Bashar al Assad, in an attempt to justify yet another round of barbarity, alongside laughable claims of an alleged “Novichok” attack in Salisbury, not too far from the murder factory of Porton Down, where British Troops, were cynically killed during experiments to find a cure for the “Common Cold?”.
So what has changed in the United Kingdom, since the election of hundreds of women, whom have made a lot of noise about cornering the better jobs for themselves but very little in the direction of changing the behaviour of the bellicose women whom have had years of control in the Top Job, in England, Scotland and now Northern Ireland, and with what have the people actually been presented by these scurrilous self seekers? why a seamless continuation of the same old bullshit.
Are we to believe that had there been even more women in the British Parliament, during the recent debate about an illegal attack against Syria, a country which posed no threat to anyone, but which was defending itself, against an attack organised by the British amongst others, that those “missing women” unlike those whom were present in the Chamber, whom voted in favour of the attack on Syria, including Theresa May, would have changed the course of History by out voting a huge majority in favour of the attack? Dream on!
Women, like Jews, can never be discussed in any serious manner. Whatever a man may secretly feel about women, it is rarely openly voiced. The acceptable version always starts with a disclaimer along the lines, “Of course I know that there are good women, so don’t get me wrong, if I appear to be generalising about them in the manner in which they constantly gripe about men.”.
Those like Jordan Peterson, suggest that life is better for children in a home with both a Father and a Mother, which is suggested to be the best option, apart that is, from when the “Father” is a brute of some kind. The “Mother” is rarely presented as being the source of any problem.
I had a friend, who was a teacher in an inner-city school in the East End of London. She was under strict instructions, that in a biology lesson, the subject of genetic inheritance should never be discussed. The reason being that certain genes were dominant, which could well cause distress amongst the thirty percent of children, in local schools, whom according to the evidence of eye and hair colour, were actually calling the wrong man Daddy.
These same women, whom given the chance, would create a joyful world built on a foundation of love and motherly care, actually create a family situation, in which ninety percent of fathers have lost all contact with their children two years after a family break-down. These thoroughly modern women, tenaciously demand the right to kill the unborn, while the survivors of this cull are reared by child-care establishments, wherein they are carefully conditioned to believe that Jews are the Chosen People etc.
While in the opening clip it was with great temerity suggested that men were smarter than women in all and everything apart from in the most important crafts in life, like the application of mascara – which in another place, another woman, suggested that make-up was an art which was used to impress other women and not men – the rush of placing women into situations where they can cause the most damage continues apace.
Not content with adopting the role of “mercy killers” women have transformed their survivors, particularly the boys into nervous little pussy-cats, whom have distanced themselves from those modern, bossy little tit less wonders in droves, in a world where a “real woman” has become a fabulous creature who will be adored for ever and ever by the lucky man who finds her.
Primary and Junior school education has long been in the grip of women and it has proven to be a total disaster for children, whom are now attempting to learn in an environment which is totally alien, where teachers can hardly communicate with the children whom speak the dozens of foreign languages of the immigrants whom now fill British and European classrooms. How many times does it need to be explained, our silence will not solve any of the problems. By the way did anyone notice International Men’s Day flitting by?
The British Establishment have placed fully briefed spokesmen all across the media, explaining away events in Salisbury, where they have had every opportunity to prepare a load of pap in support of the latest version of their fabulous tale, which finally settles on a liquid Novichok, which is called a gel, to suit their claim that it was on the door handle of the Skripal home.
The spokesmen are also up to date with how things are going in Douma in Syria, where loyal British doctors have taken, samples of the hair, urine and blood of the victims, because that’s what you do in those sort of situations, especially those guys from SAMS and the White Helmets, whose word is Gospel for the British by whom they are funded. While those evil Russians will have already hidden all the dead and injured never to be seen again and unlike Novichok, which was to be found all over Salisbury, whatever was used in Syria will be gone in a flash, so of course OPCW will be forced to rely on the evidence provided by the British. This is so blatant it hurts the head to try to justify such deception.
Think about what you have been told about Hitler. I think that guy, who was introduced as Chemical Weapons expert was pretty well briefed, he knew every detail of what was going on in Syria, I assume that to be part of the job for Chemical Weapons experts, just in case they are ever called on to play the role of propagandist. I think he managed to cover every aspect of Douma, forgetting along the way that the British refused to allow Russia any access, whatsoever to the scene of the alleged crime in Salisbury, while the Skripals’ have simply disappeared. Were they ever infected by a nerve agent, who knows? The British could have murdered them far all we know.
Now that the British have decided that the Skripals’ were poisoned by ‘gel’ on the handle of the front door of their home, the next question must surely be, did Skripal not notice this strange substance on his hand and if he had, did he not clean the residue off of the door handle, which would have been the obvious reaction and as an ex-spy, did he nor smell a rat? Or on the other hand did he wipe the gel off of his hand onto the leg of his trousers for example and did he not leave traces on everything he touched all day long? This is claim has rubbish written all over it.