It is the thirtieth anniversary of the attempt to rid the world of the government of Margaret Thatcher. The Irish Republican Army, planted bombs in the Brighton Hotel, in which she and members of her staff were lodged during the Conservative Party Conference. This was cold-blooded terrorism, so we are told.
During a debate on Murnaghan, the “Flagship” Sky News Sunday morning political farce, a guest suggested that the IRA at least made efforts to limit casualties, by warning the Police of bomb attacks, with coded messages. This annoyed Murnaghan, an “Irishman,” who interjected with “Let’s not glamorise them, they were terrorists after all.”
Another guest added, “Unlike the Muslim terrorists, whose aim is to kill as many innocent people as possible, like on 911 and 7-7,” he then mentioned a few other foiled plots, all of which were based on rubbish, so apart from the two “False Flag” attacks, which have never been properly investigated, in order to protect the guilty, there is no evidence of any serious Muslim terrorism. Murnaghan made no comment.
The next segment included a Tory MP, who announced outright that he believes that the UK should have been bombing Syria into submission, from the word go. Another guest posed the question, “Why was the UK refusing to recognise the State of Palestine?” Murnaghan whined about Palestinian terrorism and the plight of those poor Israelis who might find themselves isolated on their settlements, built on stolen land, should the real borders be accepted by the International Community, whatever that is. This we are told, is NOT cold-blooded terrorism. Where’s the harm in a few buckets of blood running down a foreign street?
Perhaps Murnaghan should have a quiet word with his colleague, Sam Kiley, the shaven headed merchant of disinformation on Sky News, who recently informed us that David Cameron’s remark about reserving the right to put “Boots on the ground” in Syria, should circumstances demand, without a debate in Parliament, to be perfectly justified, should there be a brutal genocidal attack against civilians, for example. Murnaghan could ask Kiley why the continuing genocide by Israel against the civilians in Gaza and the West Bank, did not qualify for the same sort of intervention, why were Khazar Jews not considered as terrorists? Note that any mention of Assad includes the word “brutal.”
The problem with all of these murderous escapades, in which the British have been involved, it has never been clear as the whether there is a definite political aim in view or whether they amount to no more than a policy of International Genocide.
It has been made perfectly clear that there was a mountain of lies generated by the US and UK, along with their “cuddly coalition” to destroy Iraq. Part of this destruction involved the cooperation of the newly installed Islamic government in Iran, the very same Iran which was involved in the “Iran/Contra Affair,” with that US “Mob” The Central Intelligence Agency.
This cooperation with Iran, clearly shows the US arming of both sides in the war between Iran and Iraq, with the support of Israel, which like the US, now considers Iran as their mortal enemy and yet it was the Secular state of Iraq, with its mixed race population, which lived peacefully together, which was destroyed, without a moments care for the fate of the millions of innocent deaths which ensued.
The one sure thing about this war with Iran, is the fact that it depleted Saddam Hussein’s Military capabilities. It was adequate to enter Kuwait, with the OK of the US, to sort out a problem of “slant drilling” and pumping of Iraqi oil but of course the rest of the Iraqi military machine was annihilated, with illegal weapons, during the retreat home. We then, on top of had all that, the Sanctions, which led to the deaths of at least one million innocent souls, including five hundred thousand children.
So when “Our Boys” went in with “Shock and Awe” they were attacking a basically defenceless country and did they go to town? It was nothing more than a “Demolition Derby.” What the Coalition achieved in Iraq was a “Crime Against Humanity,” based on lies and a desire to control all of the oil and gas in the Middle East. It was of course presented as “humanitarian.”
The same lies applied to the invasion and destruction of Afghanistan and Libya. Having created exactly what they had aimed for in Libya, chaos, the British are still complimenting themselves on their courageous act of altruism and swear that the Libyan people are now, despite their current, difficulties, far better off than under Gadaffi.
In Syria, where the British had long been planning to replace the Assad family with their chosen puppets, the initial murders were carried out by aid terrorists, under the control of the SAS, with Stuart Ramsey and Sky News on hand to film The Revolution.
The British would do well to remember that the following video clip, show exactly what the Jewish leaders of the main political Parties in the UK are doing with your taxes. The Jew Cameron has just announced a three-year war, using these same murdering filth, to unseat a man, Assad, who is guilty of no crime, apart from the lies which are told against him by the Jewish controlled governments, who are lined up against him and who have already seen to the complete destruction of the country and the displacement of millions of people.
All of the current exploits of the US and UK could have come straight out of the notebook of Lewis Carroll. The British are training PKK terrorists to fight against ISIL; which was set up by the CIA, who we are being told are fighting rebels which have already been armed and trained by the British to fight Assad in Syria, a continuing war of which we hear very little these days, while the British are bombing sand dunes in the desert, pretending to destroy ISIL, who they are of course, continuing to support, while Turkey, which considers the PKK to be terrorists, is lining up dozens of tanks on the Syrian border but refusing to help the Peshmerger’s, while the US, like the British are dropping a few innocuous bombs, which do nothing to help the fighters on the ground, while in reality, this whole bunch of scum, are scratching around desperately seeking an excuse to destroy Syria.
I was interested in the initial excuse for the attack on this brutal dictator Assad. What I found was that all of his so-called Crimes Against Humanity, were allegedly committed during this ongoing struggle with the International Murdering Scum, now called ISIL. I can find no provable account of any atrocities against his own people prior to this struggle. There has been no mention of the fact that Syria was a prosperous country, with a contented population, nor of the fact that before the British initiated onslaught, he had already handed over more power to the elected Parliament. He was in fact an example of Plato’s idea of the “best we can hope for” a considerate dictator.
Much can be said of that other unfortunate, Gadaffi in Libya. The United Nations listed Libya above the UK in literacy, it was the country with the highest standard of living in Africa. They had free education, at hoe and abroad, a free health service, with the most modern facilities and there were no homeless people in Libya.
When the “Arab Spring” kicked off, particularly in Egypt, from the tone of the reporting on the BBC and Sky News, it soon became clear that there was more to this than was being explained on the “News.” The Muslim Brotherhood was in talks with Al Baradei in London, while the Generals were in Virginia, holding talks with the CIA.
When the street attacks started in Benghazi, it soon became clear that the British had been involved in “uprising” in Libya from the word go. Men were arrested in the desert, who were said to be UK “Diplomats” and there was evidence of SAS on the ground.
This takes our tale all the way back to the Iran/Contra Affair. Press TV, “The Voice of the Voiceless” immediately started the character assassination of Gadaffi and his regime, while Little Willy Hague, was telling us he had humanitarianism in his genes. To me it was clear that the real target of the Arab Spring was Libya. In my posts I begged Press TV not to denigrate Gadaffi, because to justify an attack on Libya would open the floodgates and it would soon be the turn of others.
Sadly, my fears were well founded, Libya is gone and it will never come back. Press TV and its team of British reporters, Nick Jones and Johnny Miller, were somewhat more extreme in their reporting than either Sky News or indeed the BBC, which begs the question, What is the real role of Iran in the mayhem in the Middle East?
We are well aware that the Mullahs were cosseted in Paris, waiting for the CIA to carry out the coup d’etat in Tehran. displacing the Shah, who was himself put in power after the overthrow of the Mosedeque regime. They also provided the excuse to hike up the price of fuel in Europe, to the delight of the Oil Barons and they now appear to be well placed to benefit from the sanctions which have been placed on Russia, by providing an alternative to Russian Gas and Oil.
All of the other enemies of Israel, Assad, Hussein, Gadaffi, Hezbollah, Hamas, have already been taken care of, why not Iran. Why wait until they have a bomb, if that is their aim?
The same sort of allegations have been made against Adolf Hitler, another victim of British duplicity, like Gadaffi, he pulled his people out of poverty, transforming them into the most prosperous country in Europe, while the rest of the Continent was still wallowing in poverty and unemployment as a result of the sort of banking fraud, from which we are once more suffering.
Hitler and Germany were the excuse to unleash a World War, which generated so much debt, that the bankers were kept in comfort in their palaces, sipping Champagne and chomping Caviare, for the following sixty years, drowning in usury and other financial frauds.
As with Assad, the claims against Hitler, were to do with things which allegedly took place after the start of the war, there is not a shred of evidence that he was guilty of any crime prior to that. Nevertheless most people believe that the war was declared to save those poor mistreated Jews.
Right now, the British public is being deluged with spokesmen who are insisting that the UK should start an offensive in Syria, to save the Kurds, while Turkey which is at war with these same Kurds sits on the border watching them die. Why should the British be more responsible for the fate of these people than is Turkey? Could it be that Turkey is waiting for an excuse to go straight for the throat of Assad, which they have been planning for years and are the British involved in this underhanded deal?
One thing is certain in this continuing state of war, there will be no shortage of refugees swarming into Europe, all of whom will be in need of a job. Traditionally these folk are offered the jobs which people of European origin do not want to do. Well there are not too many jobs like that these days and there is of course the other problem, the mass slaughter of Christians in the Middle East.
Saudi Arabia has long been involved in the creation of religious intolerance. The Wahhabi version of Islam originated in the Gulf States and has been despatched across the region provoking problems between Sunni and Shiite, which has now spread its wings to include Christians. That was of course always part of the plan, which is why so any Muslims have been invited into Europe, by those government which are in fact under the control of Khazar Jews and they are numerous.
The UK is already suffering from the empty promises of politicians, intent on retaining their soft job in Parliament. All of the promises made during the recent referendum in Scotland, promises which helped them win the vote, have already been forgotten by Cameron and his liars.
The British voter should not vote for one single politician who has been elected in past elections. There is no such job as “Politician” and there is no need of Political Parties. This is a form of control. Anybody who was not on board for the recent vote on re-entering the war in Iraq, immediately lost their job, that is the truth of British Democracy and the Party system.
Vote only for those with a single issue manifesto, you will soon find that they are quite capable of cooperating on those measures which are in the interest of the country? They can operate on a system of short term officials in Parliament. The system is not set in stone it can be changed for the better. Surely you can do without all of that “traditional” jeering and sneering in Parliament.