We were lied into the Second World War, the Korean War, Vietnam War, War in Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan and Syria. We were lied to about 911, 7-7, and we have been lied to about many, if not all of the so-called terrorist attacks, many of which were actually planned and carried out by the FBI, including the first attack on the World Trade Centre in 1993.
After all of that we are expected to accept the word, of the British warmongers, that one day, in Salisbury, a couple of people, whom had eaten some Japanese sea-food, followed by a beer or two, were found on a park bench in need of medical care, displaying symptoms which a medical team on the spot, described as a problem which was indicative of a reaction to prescription drugs or an “upset stomach” of some sort,
The couple was taken to a hospital, after which we have never seen them again, apart from a brief, controlled interview with the daughter of the man, who remarkably turned out to be an ex Russian Agent called Skripal, who had been “turned” by the British, and who had been living openly in Salisbury for several years, after his release from a Russian gaol, at the end of his sentence.
Somewhere along the way, it was decided that the couple had been attacked by the most deadly nerve agent known to man, an example of which was quickly discovered, just up the road from Salisbury, in the worlds leading Chemical Warfare establishment, Porton Down, a shady typically British style entity, best known for having deliberately poisoned, some to death, many members of the British Military, whom were being paid to lie around in bed, while the Porton Down scientists recorded the effects of drugs, which they administered to these “guinea-pigs” telling them that they were searching a cure for the Common Cold.and that the substances which they were administering were harmless. In view of such past practices, it would therefore not be too far off the mark, to suggest that Porton Down quite deliberately poisoned the Skripals’ and concocted the rubbish about the Perfume Bottle, in an attempt to add weight to their rubbish.
The British Government have presented no evidence whatsoever of the claim that the couple had been poisoned by the substance, which they called “Novichok,” the name given to a nerve agent in a film, a name which meant nothing whatsoever to the Russians, whom asked for but never received an example of the deadly agent, which in fact had killed nobody, all the alleged victims have fully recovered, apart from a drug addict, who actually died, having tried out a ‘substance’ in a “sealed” bottle of perfume, which she had found, which it was immediately claimed to have been Novichok.
The British then managed to dig out a couple of Russians whom they claimed came through a British Airport, with this bottle of perfume in their pocket, from which the “Novichok’ was simply oozing out all over the place. trace of it was detected, though nobody knows by what technique, everywhere the Russian visitors spent a moment or two. As had been the case a few years previously, when another Russian Agent “allegedly” left traces of a deadly radio-active substance, called Polonium all over London, which was “allegedly” used to poison another Russian Double Agent called Litvinenko. No proof of any of this nonsense has ever been presented by the British, whom are now claiming that as does Assad in Syria, Putin is now using Chemical Weapons ‘against his own people’.
A while back, we were presented with a masked man, who spoke with a robots voice, who told us that he was going to cut off the head of a man, who was kneeling dutifully by his side, waiting eagerly, with no fuss, to have his head cut off with a pen-knife. The man responsible was said to be a British man, whose identity will always be Jihad John, which is what he was called by the Media. No proof of his identity was ever provided.
The British claimed to have pinpointed Jihad John, in an area of desert, somewhere in the Middle East, to where they despatched a drone, which with pinpoint accuracy, blasted Jihad John to smithereens. How they verified the accuracy of this claim has never been explained, but it illustrates the British use of extreme measures to deal with a problem, similar to that which they are now hypocritically criticising Russia, which they allege took similar action against one of their traitors.
The Home of the Brave, Land of the Free, have written a law which allows the execution of any American Citizen, who is perceived to threaten the United States, this is written into a law called The National Defence Authorisation Act. No criticism from the Brits about that one either. So the ‘what’s good for us’ routine does not apply to Russia as it is not a member of NATO I suppose.
And how can we ever forget the strange life and death of that phantom of the night, cave dweller, Osama bin Laden, who came to us uniquely on film, with several actors sharing the leading role, who was once called the ‘most dangerous man on earth, who was mysteriously tracked down to a ‘compound’ in Pakistan, where he was interrupted while watching some of his own ‘alleged’ capers on television news, and whisked away to an unknown destination, where he was summarily killed and thrown into the Indian Ocean. I hope you all dutifully swallowed this load of total crap.
Speaking of Osama bin Laden, he, as did the ‘alleged’ suicide bombers on 911, many of whom survived their suicide, came from Saudi Arabia, a State which is wholly controlled by Zionists, which plays the role of the ‘front man’ for Rothschild’s Palestine. So in the following clip, in which it is disclosed that Saudi Arabia, is prepared to finance the total destruction of Syria, if the Americans will carry out the task, we could, with some justification, suggest that the land which gave us the 911 hijackers and the man who planned it all, Osama bin Laden were an enemies of Islam, working covertly for Israel, as were many of those implicated in the 911 attack in New York. Dubious claims are being generated to provide an excuse as to why Saudi Arabia would want to destroy Syria, all of which will no doubt be swallowed by Western politicians. Never mind the question, “why would the United States even consider such a proposition, in a deal which would most probably involve the Brits and French?’