A Call From The Garrigue. Standing Up For The Under Threat White Race.

Posts tagged “Prince Charles

The BBC Presents: The Paedophile Follies. An Epic Drama Of Biblical Proportions.

The latest scandal involving the BBC has an all-star line-up, and in keeping with other British Dramas of a similar nature, the stars would prefer to retain their anonymity. The names of those whom have died since recording their contribution to the affair, such as Jimmy Savile and John Peel, have leaked out as has the name of convicted paedophile Gary Glitter.

The British Police Force, which is still arguing with a Member of Parliament, who cannot remember what naughty names he called members of the force, whom would not open a gate for him to ride through on his bike, is in the process of investigating hundreds of reports of sexual harassment and inappropriate “touching” by dead man Jimmy Savile, is the same force which made no effort whatsoever to investigate another well-known paedophile ring, which included high-ranking members of the Police Force, Judiciary, Big Business and an unknown number of members of the War Criminal Anthony Blair’s Government.

I am of course referring to the Dunblane Massacre, inquiry which was carried out by a procurer of children, for a Free-masonic Group which referred to itself as the Speculative Society. This group was so insidious that it involved the head of NATO, whom provided the necessary clearance for the killer to arm himself with the weapons with which to kill the children and even the Judge, who carried out the inquiry, was said to be a member of the same Masonic Lodge.

The results of the inquiry were never made public, in fact there was a hundred year secrecy order, which is unheard of, slapped on the findings. This was of course to hide the identities of the likes of Gordon Brown, who has been called a well-known paedophile for sometime and other members of the British government and the European Parliament.

Of course the history of this Force, which insists that it has integrity and is prepared to see the sacking of the MP, who has suggested that a report, which was written by the Bobby involved, was inaccurate and thus called into question the reliability of the contents of statements, which may be used in evidence, in a future Court Case, in fact the Police have some strange interpretation of the word integrity.

Speaking for myself, I have stood in Court, listening to statements from the Police, which were so full of lies, that they could not even present evidence which tallied with that of a colleague. They are inveterate liars.

However to find a representative of the Police, who was prepared to argue in support of Police integrity, so soon after the revelations of the inquiry into the Hillsborough disaster, which disclosed Police lies and the alterations of statements, in order to excuse themselves of culpability in the event, which went right to the top of the Force, does not give one confidence in any investigation in which they are involved, which like Dunblane, appears to involve the Upper Classes.

The tentacles of this horrific chain of events, which involves innocent young children and handicapped people in wheel chairs, has several tenuous links with the events in Dunblane, which will put it right into the territory of Hollie Greig, the Downs Syndrome child whom was systematically abused, by high-ranking members of the Scottish Establishment, whom may also have been members of the Speculative Society, a case which is still waiting for an investigation and prosecution, after many years.

The character at the centre of this affair, Sir Jimmy Savile, was a good friend of Prince Charles. He spent many happy hours with the Prince and the now dead, in very strange circumstances, Princess Diana. The Prince has a brother,  Prince Andrew – whose wife Sarah Ferguson, was miraculously whipped out of the World Trade Centre on the morning of 911 – was refused a place at a commemoration of some sort or other at The Queen Victoria School in Dunblane, because of his association with a man who was convicted of paedophilia, and who enjoyed “Plate Jobs,” which were carried out by females whom were paid to perform the operation.




The young lads from the Queen Victoria School were obliged to wear hunting Kilts, when they attended a get-together at the “Lodge”, here is a photo of Savile’s kilt and jacket which he wore when he went walking in Scotland with Prince Charles.

I have no way of knowing whether, like the young boys’ from the Queen Victoria School, they went commando, by order of the Lodge.

However it must quite clear that when reports started to float to the surface, concerning Savile’s behaviour at the BBC, a lot of highly placed perverts must have started to quake in their boots.

It has always been a mystery as to why this creepy little character with no talent whatsoever, was retained for such a long period of time by the various branches of the media.

Perhaps it was a question of what he knew and where the evidence was hidden. However, I can assure my readers, that having spent a short period in the company of highly placed members of the BBC’s News and Current Affairs, Television Reporting Team, that Jimmy Savile and his cronies were not the only predators in the jungle, in fact any reasonably attractive woman, whom joined the staff, was instantly targeted by the “Stars” of the team.

Prince Charles, would appear to have been aware that Savile was a womanizer, whether he was aware that the targets were invariably very young or disabled in some way, is another story. He was familiar enough with Savile to have sent a message, asking Savile to give his,Prince Charles’, love to all his women in Scotland.

During his relationship with the Prince and Diana, at their country Mansion, just outside Avening in Gloucestershire, not too far away from the home of Princess Anne near Minchinhampton, Savile could have collected any amount of “dangerous” information, which would have given him a certain amount of leeway and it would  be considered a bad move to “out” him if you were after promotion.

News staff at the BBC and other News outlets, have been indoctrinated by News Editors as to which questions may be asked and those which are verboten. Which is why nothing was mentioned by those whom apparently, knew exactly what was going on at the Beeb, until after Savile’s death, at which point it can be aired and then buried and we can all say, how we knew all along that he was weird.

Be warned that the team on “Newsnight,” which had prepared a report, which was shelved, exposing the antics of Savile at the BBC, took it no further. Had the Independent Television Current Affairs team not got a hold of the story and presented it to the public, the BBC would have left it buried, along with a whole load of other things which they refuse to discuss, like for example how they managed to report the collapse of Building Seven at Ground Zero twenty minutes before the event.

Note: In this more recent exposure of  massive  paedophile activity in Hollywood, a top BBC man has been implicated, Garth Ansier, he has been reported to the FBI. I would like to know if the information has in fact been passed to the BBC.


see   P2 and the Speculative Society

Sloshing Around in the Murky British Cesspit


Our Nation States Are Being Deliberately Destroyed.

By profession, I am not a trained researcher. I have no degree in Political Science. I have no trust in politicians and I am simply not convinced by the image of the world with which we are being presented. I spend a fair amount of my time trying to dig out the origins of the controls which are being put in place to control our lives. It is not an easy task. My rule of thumb is, politicians by nature are corrupt, they all appear to have their price.

Why, for example, are the governments of Western countries, prepared to accept, absolutely ridiculous dictates which are passed from the United Nations to the European Union and on to member States? Is there really any need of advice from the UN as to the benefits or otherwise of Natural Medicines? Do we really need a prescription from a doctor before we are allowed to buy a product such as Cod Liver Oil, which has been keeping populations healthy for generations?

Who is making these decisions? What is their motivation? In a world, where health care costs are rising to such a level as to be unaffordable, why are the people who rely on their own ability to maintain their health, being forced into the waiting rooms of already overworked doctors? Why is it being made illegal to advise a friend to eat fresh fruit and vegetables for health reasons?

What is the point of forcing people who make use of Natural Medicines, which are at least as efficacious as the treatments from the large drug companies, which are responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people annually, to make use of chemicals which have done nothing to promote good health, despite their high cost.

Did the government of France for example, have no input into the composition of Codex Alimentarius? If they did, why was the debate not extended to the people? Why was I not asked? Why am I at risk of losing the right to consult my Naturopath, Homoeopathic Doctor? Why have the majority of  people never even heard of Codex Alimentarius? What part did the money of the large drug companies play in the proposition of this unimportant piece of legislation?

I can find no good answer to any of these questions. Legislation in Europe appears as if by magic. No vote is taken in the European Parliament, it is passed by whoever initiated the idea. Borosso and the rest of the committee are little more than mouth-pieces for the real controllers, who are kept hidden from view. The legislation is then passed on to what have become little more than regional assemblies which are obliged to introduce the rules. No vote is allowed in these assemblies. So I return to the question, why are our governments accepting this situation?

William Hague, the British Foreign Secretary, who claims to have humanitarianism in his jeans genes, is pushing for an invasion of Libya and is already hinting at the same thing for Syria, yet he is ignoring the carnage which is taking place in Yemen and Bahrain, he has in fact ordered a news blackout on events in these two States. Why has the UN and the EU reinforced this news blackout? Why have sanctions been imposed against Gadaffi and Assad and not against Bahrain and Yemen? Who instructed these two bodies, neither of which are elected, to decide that events in Bahrain and Yemen are to be tolerated?

Did Ministers from European Governments participate in the drawing up of new boundaries in Europe, which will completely destroy the integrality of Nation States, which are destined to be controlled by unelected  regional Governors. If they did, who were they and who authorised them to do so?


Why is the UK, which is already a group of regions, to be cut into parts, which will have no connection to the regions which already exist?  What is the point in linking the South of England to the North of France? To my mind it is simply a means of destroying National Identity and to simplify the installation of an unelected regime, which appears to be headed by the same group who have announced their intention of imposing the same system across the World.

So I will ask again, why are our elected politicians so eager to go along with this agenda?  They are quite evidently not doing it for our benefit. A more important question might be, Why is the Queen signing all the necessary treaties, which appear to be dismembering her State? Of what, if anything, will Prince Charles ever become King?

Of course in the midst of all this muddle we find Lord Rothschild, of whom little can be said for fear being accused of anti-Semitism.  He has just overseen the introduction of yet another of his relatives into an already overly inbred group of people, for which the poorest of people were called on to pay for an event for the richest people in the world. The words leech or parasite spring to mind. As for the folks who glory in these events, no comment.

So there you have it. I can only make guesses as to the answer to any of these questions. Why is this so? Why is this information which will affect us all, not readily available? Secrecy raises doubts. So if there is secrecy we can be sure it is because we are not going to be happy about whatever is about to be imposed on us.