Not much sign of turmoil in a classroom which has just suffered a frenzied attack.
The Security Guard at the Parklands School, Florida, who failed to enter the school during an attack, to save the lives of the children, whom he had been paid to protect, has now, having been outed as a coward resigned, under a cloud.
This report struck a chord in my mind, which reverberated all the way back to the attack on Virginia Tech, reports of which I had heard live on the wireless. The big question at the time had been, “Why did the police wait for more than an hour, before entering the building?” This failure allowed the alleged killer enough time to kill thirty-three people before killing himself. So in fact the police presence served no purpose whatsoever, they did not even have to arrest the killer, whom they apparently picked out from amongst the other dead and wounded.
As in the recent attack in Florida, the police and others had been alerted to the fact that there was an alleged ‘loose cannon’, adrift in the Virginia Tech and yet they took no action. This wily Oriental, wisely carried out his slaughter using two hand-guns, one of them being a 9mm Glock and a tiny 0.22 pistol of some sort. He also found time to post a package of information to the ABC News office. The attack was carried out in two phases an hour apart, so the Police were extremely generous in their response. He would also have been obliged to re-load his pistols, which would have rendered him helpless, while in the middle of numerous students whom it would appear to have been incapable of taking advantage of this opportunity to disarm the diminutive Oriental.
The attack in Columbine set the standard for all of these future events, The Cops and SWAT teams appear to have held off for several hours, before entering the premises, when having managed to save nobody, they spent hours looking for dead and wounded, without calling in the Medics.
“April 21, 1999|JULIE CART and ERIC SLATER and STEPHEN BRAUN | TIMES STAFF WRITERS
LITTLETON, Colo. — Laughing as they killed, two youths clad in dark ski masks and long black coats fired handguns at will and blithely tossed pipe bombs into a crowd of their terrified classmates Tuesday inside a suburban high school southwest of Denver, littering halls with as many as 23 bodies and wounding at least 25 others. The gunmen, embittered youths reportedly fascinated with paramilitary culture, kept police sharpshooters at a distance for more than four hours before they apparently used their guns on themselves.
The day’s horror mounted with unrelieved dread, a grim cascade that began with the startling clap of explosions and ended with a schoolhouse transformed into a tomb. No American high school has seen so much violent death at the hands of its own children – and late into the night, the day’s reckoning was not yet done.……..Police had pursued reports that a third suspect joined the two heavily armed assailants as they burst into the school building shortly after 11:30 a.m. and lobbed several explosive devices. But police later said the youth was not being sought as an accomplice, but was being questioned about the motives of the two dead suspects, whose weakness for dark fatigues and black clothes led many students to deride them as the “Trench Coat Mafia…….. One girl watched fellow students gunned down around her in the library, one after another. The gunman laughed as he fired, killing a girl next to the girl and then dispatching a boy nearby before aiming his gun at her.
“I begged him not to shoot me and he just put the gun in my face and he started waving it and said it was all because someone was mean to him last year,” said the survivor, identified only as “Judy” in a televised interview.
Yes indeed even the survivors tales have a familiar ring to them.
Why, one might wonder, were the Police, having been given reports of a third suspect, choose to ignore the reports and instead question the third suspect about the motives of the killers, how would he know what their motives might have been if he was not a part of the team.
This takes me all the way back to Sandy Hook, where two men were clearly filmed from a Helicopter, fleeing, into the woods from the Sandy Hook school, chased by a couple of cops. These men were caught and taken away in a Police car, eyewitnesses were filmed telling us of this series of events.
The only future reference to these two men, which I managed to dig out, suggested that one of them, worrying about the fate of his child, had entered the building through a window, and having found his daughter, alive and well, crouching inside a cupboard, he jumped out of the same window by which he had entered, leaving his daughter behind and for some reason and fearing a negative reaction from the Police, he legged it into the woods where he was captured and for all we know, executed to prevent him from letting us know that the school was empty. No future mention was ever made about the man who was arrested or the guy with him in the school and who ran into the woods with him. They were quite obviously thieves and did a plea bargain with the cops or were executed to shut them up, which would suggest their were no dead bodies in the school, which is what Occam’s Razor would suggest.
Meanwhile back in Columbine, we were told that the evil masked Goths, laughed as they tossed pipe bombs, which exploded amongst the terrified youngsters in the class. I can assure anybody, who may be tempted to waste their time making pipe bombs with freely available chemicals and sugar, that to simply “toss one” into a crowd and snigger as it explodes, is nothing more than fantasy and Fake News and it throws into doubt the rest of the tale as it was reported. It is quite difficult to explode a pipe bomb, without sophisticated electronic equipment, even then it is difficult, a fact which in past times has called many Police reports involving so-called “pipe bombs” into question.
After all of these events, there were strident calls for restrictions on gun ownership in the USA, this despite bucket loads of evidence that the FBI has armed and trained all of the so-called Muslim terrorists, whom have been blamed for past attacks, some, like the 1993 attack on the World Trade Centre, with recorded evidence of the FBI organising and arming the Arab ‘Patsies’ with the truck bomb, which they claimed to be fake, on record. With killers like the FBI in our midst we have urgent need of weapons with which to defend ourselves, as the day cannot be too far off when we will need them.
All of the above evidence would suggest to even a Young Sherlock Holmes, that the reason why the Security man in Florida and the cops at other events, did not react in a rapid response mode, is clearly because they were aware that there was no hurry, they had been expecting there to be gunshots and they waited patiently for the order to enter the premises, where the scene had been laid out in such a manner that the school kids actually witnessed nothing at all, while now familiar tales are related to the media by invited “witnesses.”
In Florida that day, there had been two Military Drills, one of them at the very moment the so-called “mad school-boy” struck, so why would the Security man, who would have been fully informed about these drills rush in?
The most common feature, not only in the few events which I have mentioned but in the vast majority of cases, is the evidence that the Police did not respond in the correct manner, but simply hung around outside waiting for the ‘all clear’ command. Another feature is the distinct shortfall in Ambulances at the scene of the crime and the dead bodies of children, left lying in their own blood overnight.
This happened at Virginia Tech, Columbine, Sandy Hook and even in Nice, France and yet there is not a shred of evidence to show that after a train wreck, for example, that the medical staff simply left the scene, with parting words like those of Wayne Carver, the Medicine Man at Sandy Hook, that even though he had not checked out all the dead bodies in the school, to verify not even the number of boys and girls and that he intended to continue his investigation the following morning. Such is the consideration for the welfare and emotions of those families, awaiting news of their children.
In all of these cases, whether it be Muslim Terrorists or schoolboys on medicine, and whether in the United Kingdom, France or the United States, the perpetrators of these events are invariably, already under suspicion, which is the point which I have been attempting to understand, that is the difference between a ‘hoax’ and a ‘false flag,’ in a hoax nobody dies while in a false flag, many people may die, but who or whom is doing the killing, friend or foe?
When Israel carried out an attack against the USS Liberty, that would be a form of ‘false flag’ the intention being to lay the blame on Egypt, while in Florida, Nikolas Cruz, on finding himself in a school, where a friend explained that she thought of him, when she heard the sound of gunfire, fled the scene, having had a flash of inspiration, as to why he had been invited to play a part in a drill, he was picked up by Police, a long way from the scene, whom seemed to know exactly for who they were searching, If that is the case, it would be better, for all of us if nobody had died.
The events themselves, always seem to present an excuse to impose further ‘fear based’ restrictions onto the activities of ‘We the People, through the propagation of the idea that nobody is safe from the long arm of the ‘terrorist’ nor indeed from some ‘long known to the FBI,’ prescription drug induced ‘psychotic’ schoolboy.
In the recent event in Florida, the sad, little boy lost, Nicolas Cruz, who we are told was expelled from school, when he should have been shown sympathy, having been abandoned by his parents and forced to live with strangers, after the death of both of his Foster Parents, was selected as the ‘patsy, ‘ using the excuse, that he had been prescribed dangerous drugs, which huge numbers of school-children in the United States have also been prescribed, when in reality, for some unknown reason, he was actually in the school, during a drill, which was ongoing, even as he spoke to another child, who herself knew exactly who he was, even as shots were ringing out, in another part of the school, demonstrating that he could not possibly have been a lone ‘mad’ killer kid.
The first question needs to be, what prompted Cruz to go to the school, from which he had been expelled, on the very day that not one but two drills were taking place? Was he late for the first drill, so it had to be repeated, when his arrival had been verified? The Patsy has now entered the building!
The reluctance of the same mainstream media, to look into these anomalies, despite them all having their first airing on the mainstream media itself and later ignored, is indicative of the collusion between the media and the ‘Deep State’ or is theFBI a utility of the Deep State?
As with the reports in the United Kingdom, when the attack on Manchester Arena was reported, the most significant information often slips out in the first, uncensored reports, which are the most important. I was listening to Russia Today UK, at the time and I heard Bill Dod, RT’s UK Daily News anchor, speaking to a women, who on leaving the arena early, was refused access to an exit area, by security men, from where she heard the sound of a muffled explosion, as she turned to leave by another exit. That was quite obviously the proof of a contrived attack scene, entry to which everybody, apart from the ‘Actors’ were refused entry. There was no bomb in the arena itself.
At Sandy Hook the same routine, nobody was allowed to see the inside of the school. No children were seen to evacuate the school. There were no signs of ambulances at the scene and according to certain locals, there were young kids, unattended wandering around all over the place.
I watched the tale unfold at Westminster Bridge in the United Kingdom, the body of a woman, behind the ‘back-wheels of a double-decker bus, intrigued me, as to how anyone could be run over by both sets of wheels on an extremely heavy bus and not have had at least had a trace of blood forced from her squashed body.
Television viewers were then presented with a clip of screaming people, running from Westminster Bridge, out of a fear of being run over by the madman in a car, which would suggest that the attack was ongoing, and yet a policemen, standing alongside the ‘cameraman’, had to raise a plastic crime scene ribbon, to allow the fleeing survivors to pass under it.
So it would appear that the Bridge was already cordoned off in readiness for the attack, where ‘passers by’ were to be seen, treating blood free and missing shoe type victims, while a few of those whom did not flee, stood with hands to mouths, in that typical response to such events of horror. There uninvolved pedestrians,walking past the scene, without even bothering to stop and take a look, having already decided it to be a staged event. A young lad was actually filmed saying that it was all part of a drill.
We later saw gurney, with victims aboard, being wheeled into the Marriott Hotel, instead of to the hospital which was only a few yards away, even as a whole line of ambulances stood idly by.
These events could not have been staged in a more ridiculous, lackadaisical manner, if that had been the intention from the start, however, the mainstream media presents all this guff, without a trace of sham, which now called the ‘official tale’, which has never been investigated, apart from by idiots like me, a tale which is now so completely accepted as the honest truth and that, my friends, is how the media spreads total propaganda for those whom desire to take away our rights.
In all of the above, we have yet to see a real victim, all we see are smiling people cosily wrapped up in a hospital bed giggling at the Queen of England as she is cynically used to emphasise the seriousness of the ‘attack.’
After the Bataclan attack in Paris, I watched a Sky News reporter, talking to a man in a white coat, with a hospital in the background, where severely injured people were supposedly being treated, asking the man whether the injuries were of a serious nature. The “doctor”, with a broad smile on his face mumbled some non-committal nonsense, when in fact with Kalashnikov being loosed off in a crowded theatre, I have been assured by experts, that arms and legs would most certainly have been blown away and probably a few heads as well and yet the Doctor made no mention of anything in any way as serious as that for some reason.
I have seen scenes of massacres, which have occurred, thanks to ISIS all across the Middle East, scenes which are shown quite openly on television and yet when it comes to these ‘bloody’ attacks on home soil, we are suddenly all too timid and fragile and quite incapable of looking at images of such brutal reality.
In Florida, there are already suggestions that the school involved in the recent attack, should be demolished as was Sandy Hook, even before the lies of the FBI, which was miraculously on the scene like greased shit, almost as if they were expecting something to happen, can be checked out, after all they have themselves been responsible for all of the so-called Muslim terrorist attacks, so perhaps they are now taking control of the ‘Excuse for Gun Grabbing’ events as well.
Even those whom have become frightened to even suggest there to be anomalies in many of these school shootings and concert attacks, having been bad-mouthed as being conspiracy theory idiots, cannot help but throw caution to the wind to ask the simple question, how could there have been a bunch of Military men, prowling around in the Florida school, shooting so-called blank rounds, even as the ‘patsy’ was leaving the building with other kids, whom had been warned to leave the building because there was a drill going on, as shots were still ringing out and did those Military Men kill all those kids, which is how it appears. A young girl on film saw the Military kill people and cover them with carpets.
Joel Skouson, a guest on Rense Radio, did today relate a tale of the Sandy Hook hoax,which was completely at odds with the tale which Rense and Jim Fetzer, a broadcaster on the Rense network, have agreed on for years. To my amazement Rense accepted every word of the Skouson version, which I found to be quite ridiculous, without a word of criticism.
Quite suddenly, a large number of the once sceptical sites on the Inter-Web, which in past times denounced all of the ‘terrorist’ attacks across Europe and the United States, as hoaxes or false flags, are now telling us that all of those attacks were, indeed carried out by Muslims, in order to reinforce, their new claim that those hoax/false flag, attacks are indeed perfectly true and are as a result of the open door policy for ‘refugees,’ whom arrive with terrorists hidden amongst them, instead of concentrating, not on Muslims but on ‘non-refugees’ whom are streaming in from Africa.
Refugees, should be given shelter until the time comes when they can return to their own country. To provide them with the right to permanent domicile in another country, is an unusual step, unless they would be at risk should they return home.
The United States and Britain had no problem about sending thousands of prisoners, both German and others, back into the hands of Stalin, knowing full well that they would be brutally tortured and killed. So what lies behind the current idea that all of the member states of the European Union, the United States, Australia, New Zealand and Canada are obliged, under threat, to rehouse millions of ‘refugees’ in White Christian Countries?
Why, on the other hand, has there been no universal uproar against the Jews in Israel, whom instantly deport all of the ‘infiltrators’ into Israel, back to whichever country from which they came? After all, it is mainly Jews whom are demanding that we Europeans accept millions of Muslims into our midst, why not do the same thing, which they so stridently propose for us? Let us be quite clear about it, Israel is too Jew, is it not?
There are a couple of million Syrian refugees in Turkey and when hostilities end, one way or another they will find their way back to Syria, so why is it such a problem for Europe to repatriate refugees back to their homelands?
The British have been promising to reduce immigration into a country, which is already the most densely populated country in Europe, without success and yet Poland and Hungary have both managed to restrict immigration to zero, in recent times, so how was this achieved? Could it be simply because they do not want immigrants? Should that be the case how are they managing to survive, while Britain needs, in the order of three-hundred- thousand immigrants a year just to keep up with the need of fruit pickers?
The answer must lie somewhere in the actions of all political parties across Europe, where all of the governments in recent times, have been prepared to destroy their own countries, by inviting the enemy to set up house, within the castle walls. Strangely, Merkel is a Jew, Cameron is a Jew, Hollande and Sarkozy are Jews I wonder if there can be any connection between that and Muslim and Black immigration into Europe, and the plan to homogenised Europeans out of existence, as proposed by the founders of the European Union?
The British People make a point of blaming their victims for the crimes which they carried out. It was the British government, which having dismissed, the ‘appeaser’ Neville Chamberlain, set about trapping the German people, through the use of ‘controlled terrorism’ against ethnic Germans in the Sudetenland, and having encouraged Hitler to save them, used his humanitarian act, as an excuse to bomb Germany into the stone-age, as they say, slaughtering, without a qualm, twenty-million German people in the process..
The weight of the guilt of the British and their Allies, is so great, that here we are, seventy years on, still bad-mouthing Adolf Hitler, who was in fact their ‘victim,’ in order to justify their crime.
They more recently used exactly the same tactic, to ensnare, Gadaffi in Libya and now Assad in Syria, both of whom they describe as ‘brutal dictators.’ While just as they did at Nuremberg, where they implicated the Germans in alleged atrocities, without any evidential back-up, they are now accusing Russia and Donald Trump of all and everything, without a shred of evidence in support, while all around there is to be found a ton of evidence of the barbarity of the British and the Americans along with their rulers in Israel.
A woman for whom I once had respect Deanna Spingola, has disintegrated into a babbling idiot in her efforts to prove that twenty-six adults and children, really did die in a massacre, which she continues to claim was perpetrated by a drug crazed half-wit, called Adam Lanza, in order to pass the blame for the outrage in the direction of Big Pharma.
It would appear that she now has the support of the boss of Republic Broadcasting Network, John Stadtmiller, in her efforts. However she resolutely refuses to give any adequate response to many of the anomalies which simply do not add up.
She has just claimed, in response to a question from a caller, who suggested that the violent deaths of twenty-six people in a classroom would have spilt so much blood that any first responder would have been obliged to walk through this blood, leaving bloody foot-prints everywhere they walked. Spingola immediately contradicted his claim with her own claim that there was indeed blood everywhere inside and outside the school.
Well I have personally seen not a spot of blood anywhere near Sandy Hook, however in response to her claim, I have just carried out a swift search. The first link was in fact towards the good old Daily Mirror, which was part of the Jew Robert Maxwell’s Empire, the headline offered chilling new photographs, from Sandy Hook.
Inside the school itself, everything looked perfectly normal, the only sign of a problem was a broken plate-glass window, with granules of glass on a bench. Not a trace of blood anywhere.
I have already looked through the photographs in the Police report, which Spingola tells us she supports, which were taken inside the school, images in which Spingola can see evidence of blood everywhere, blood which stubbornly remains invisible to the rest of us, in the manner of the photographs which showed us the “horror” inside the Charlie Hebdo office, which showed no more than a half-open door into the room where the alleged shooting took place, with no sign of blood and most certainly not a trace of a bullet hole anywhere.
She totally ignored the same callers question about the man who ran out of the school into the woods, with the Police in full pursuit, by suggesting that because the helicopter, which filmed the event, was not overhead at the time that the questioner suggested it to have been, there was no reply necessary.
On a recent programme,with a co-presenter, she tackled the question of the Crisis Actors, involved in the Sandy Hook event. Her chum, offered very little hard evidence in support own his claims, choosing instead to refer to those with another point of view, as outright liars.
Between them they spent several minutes excusing Robbie Parker, who became an Inter-Web sensation because of the humorous conversation he was involved in, while waiting for his turn to take the micro-phone, on CNN, and the efforts he was obliged to use to wipe the smile off of his face.
Sadly, Spingola refuses to respond to the possibility of the existence of a completely different Robbie Parker, who has been identified in Utah. Never mind, there is still the question of his daughters. We were told, in response to questions of the truthfulness of his daughter Emilie’s alleged death, when a child, the spitting image of Emilie, suddenly appeared on Barack Obama’s knee, that it was in fact, Emilie’s little sister and that the reason she was wearing the same dress as had Emilie in a family photograph, was because they had bought two dresses at the same time.
Take a look a these photographs of the Parker family. You see three children. Emily is wearing the dress which you see the child wearing in the photograph with Obama. She is quite obviously much taller than the younger child in the family photograph. I have children and I can tell you for nothing, I would never have bought a dress for such a small child, which would be the right size, some time in the future.
That aside, the child with Obama is how old, would you suggest, six years old maybe? So why did this growth spurt not occur in Emily, who should now be at least two years older than the child in the photo, which would suggest that she could not still be six years old.
Republic Broadcasting Network is now adopting the role of the False Flag debunker. I have no problem with that, just so long as they do not try to deny me the right to demand my own questions. RBN is now suggesting, that to look into these alleged hoax incidents is a sign that I am “controlled opposition,” working for the government, simply because I find it hard to believe what I am offered by the mainstream media.
My attitude to Sandy Hook was a belief that should it have taken place at all, it was real, simply because no government would dare to kill little children, just in case it came out that they had been involved. While watching the footage I had no notion that what I was watching was not being faithfully reported.
I now find that there are no explanations for any of the events of that sad day. No blood, a daft Coroner, no sign of a large number of ambulances on their way to hospital, ridiculously contrived grieving family members and now to cap the whole thing off, the suggestion that we should simply take the word of the Police Reports.
Yet despite that, to suggest that FEMA, would never carry out a drill in any school without the support of the parents as some sort of proof, is a nonsense, because all of the evidence suggests that the school was empty, so no complicity with any parents would have been necessary.
To ignore the men who were chased by the Police, whether the helicopter came at this hour or that hour, is stupid, those men were in the school. Who were they? What were they doing in the school? Why did they run? Were they there when Lanza arrived? Do you get the picture? If the police ignored all of this, there is something going on.
We only need expose one of these hoax attacks, to bring down the government, whether anyone was killed or not. RBN is suggesting that the Governments involved would not be so stupid as to leave so many clues lying around, which generate this continual cry of False Flag, other than to deliberately occupy our minds with rubbish, through the use of youtube and other on-line facilities, which they are making freely available, if we were actually on the right track.
Therefore we are all under control. So does that mean that the those like the daft coroner were telling the truth about leaving dead children lying in their own blood while he went home, while parents must surely have been there waiting for news of their dead children?
However none of that explains why Spingola spends so much of her time slagging off Fetzer and Holbig, both of whom I ignore anyway and yet she refuses to explain, simple things like how all the children were evacuated from the school. In fact she is displaying all of the usual traits of the spoiler.
I have heard her offer nothing other than hearsay, which she has been denouncing as worthless for years on other subjects. The usual “man on the bus” told her that Adam Lanza did not like bright lights, hah ha she thought, that reminds me of Robin Williams, he is claimed to have had a problem with bright lights, just before he committed suicide and he was on psychotropic drugs, so that means Lanza was and its all a conspiracy of that ol’ Big Pharma, to avoid any implication in all of these shootings. Talk about garbage and John Stadtmiller allowed her to getaway with it.
I give up. Make up your own mind.
Yesterday evening I wasted three hours of battery power, in order to listen to Deanna Spingola, who with invited guests, was going to discuss events at the Sandy Hook Elementary School in Connecticut, where a twenty year old youth was alleged to have shot dead twenty children and six adult staff.
A while back, I heard her discussing the same event on her show, with Michael Collins Piper, a character, whom I will state here and now has something about him which does not sit well within my nervous system. Perhaps it is because he constantly refers to himself in the third person.
He suggested to Spingola that in his opinion, Sandy Hook was a genuine event and that the children had actually died as a result of gun fire. During this transmission, Spingola described Piper as her hero. My opinion of her changed radically on hearing this ridiculous admission.
Some time later a character called Holbeig drifted on to the scene, claiming to have had extensive experience in the system of security and other matters in the education system, which were relevant to the events at Sandy Hook, he suggested that as far as he was concerned, the events as reported in the Police report, did not make sense.
He was of course quickly invited on to the Spingola Show, where he was greeted by the “new” Spingola, who could hardly restrain herself for an instant, in order to allow the fellow to finish a sentence. She tore into him in a quite an embarrassing manner, dismissing out of hand all of his points of view.
On another occasion, she devoted her entire show to a dissertation on why she now believed that those people, which include me, whom she now referred to as “hoaxers,” were behaving in a manner that was continuing the agony of the families of the dead children, the mention of which started her blubbering.
She also clinically dissected a YouTube video clip of the events at Sandy Hook, claiming it to be a propaganda piece, making use of clever editing and other tricks, which most of those whom viewed the video failed to find.
At this point I contacted her, asking for an explanation as to her new-found position on the subject of Sandy Hook. I asked her to explain her new position on certain things which had little to do with whether it a “False Flag” or not but simply out of curiosity. For example, during the course of the day of the event, we were reminded on several occasions that there were hundreds of children still under lockdown in the school, I asked her how and when they had been evacuated and could she show me photographic evidence. She ignored my question and simply told me to watch her post, which included the disgraced video.
So when I discovered that she was presenting a show on Sunday afternoon, with two researchers, one from the American Free Press, to which she is also a contributor, as is Michael Collins Piper, I was interested enough to listen to the entire show, which included her blubbering at any mention of the word, “children,” in the forlorn hope that some of the troubling aspects of the Sandy Hook events might actually be cleared up.
I did somewhat timidly, suggest to her that of all the so-called “False Flag” events, that Sandy Hook was the most obvious one of all and that from the word go, nothing added up.
She promised to include a phone in, which would give a few people the opportunity to question her new stance on the subject.
The event turned out to be no more than a hatchet job on all of those whom had suggested that there was something not quite right about the official version of events, never mind the “bad acting” of some of the characters in the piece, notably Gene Rosen, who told the same story in a dozen different ways, none of which were in any way believable.
They dismissed all of the claims made by online Radio hosts, like Jeff Rense and Jim Fetzter, who was threatened with legal action by her companion from The American Free Press, I am not sure what his transgression was alleged to have been.
Somebody, somewhere, had made a claim that the Sandy Hook Elementary School had been closed down since 2007, Spingola and Friends spent a good ten minutes claiming to have found evidence that it was still open in 2009, therefore proving in some way that this implied that it was still open in 2012.
Spingola also claimed to have found evidence that Robbie Parker, the father of Emilie, was indeed a Sandy Hook resident and that she had proven that he was some sort of health worker. Well, I too discovered the same Robert Parker, however it was a much older man and he was the only Robert Parker in Newtown.
One of her chums brought up the family Posner, as an example of a family which had lost a child and were indeed prepared to discuss the subject in public, a decision which resulted in a blistering attack from those who had seen the very same photo of his dead son, under another name, in another families photo album.
They then set about the destruction of the video, “We Need To Talk About Sandy Hook,” which I had recently posted. One of the clips in this video is the scene in front of the Fire Station, where it was made clear that there were at least a few people who were walking aimlessly round and around.
This video was described as a very expensive piece of propaganda, without actually explaining the reason for such a project.
Spingola herself has expressed a belief that Big Pharma has invested heavily in the “False Flag” theory, in order to distract attention away from the fact that the killer, Adam Lanza, was using psychotropic drugs, in keeping with most of the other mass murdering youngsters in other schools.
It would however appear that the dead Lanza was found to be drug free. It has never been explained why he should have his brothers driving documents on his person, having not seen his brother for some time. That is if he is a “real” human being, unlike his image, which resembles a caricature of a zombie.
Spingola then announced that she and her chums had decided not to allow a “phone-in” fearing that it might lead to raised voices which would be disturbing for the families of the dead children. Blubber, blubber. And that was it. Not one dissenting voice allowed after three hours of rubbish.
What is more we are no closer to a reasonable explanation of what actually happened at Sandy Hook. I found the video “We Need to…..” extremely interesting, with very little which could be discredited without actually discussing things with those whom were involved in the production.
As for the Police film of the parking lot, which was running all through the period when the children were allegedly evacuated, apparently without trace, from the school, what could she complain of in that?
So all in all my faith in yet another member of the Alternative Community has been seriously shaken. It remains to be seen if she and her family have been threatened by some group and if so,whether she will stand up and say so, which is often the best approach.
I have decided to republish this post in view of the upsurge in interest in the tale, due to the publication of Jim Fetzer’s new book, Nobody Died at Sandy Hook, which has excited Deanna Spingola and friends into a frenzy of activity, in an effort to discredit Fetzer’s investigation.
Her latest programme on Republic Broadcasting, was a long and dreary tale of Christmas trees and that a good old boy Gene Rosen. As is usual no dissent was allowed. I have come to the conclusion that there is far more to Spingola’s strident new attitude to Sandy Hook, she gives the impression of trying to completely discredit her earlier work, on subjects such as The Second World War and the Holocaust.
Unless she is intent on doing an about turn on that subject as well, she would be well advised to shut up, Sandy Hook is such a blatant False Flag, which included young children being left lying dead in their own blood, on the Sandy Hook school floor, while the Coroner clocked off for the night, promising impatient journalists, that he would return in the morning to continue his inspection of the dead. No serious researcher could possibly support such nonsense.